Legal Legacy of 9/11
Legal Legacy of 9/11
In the weeks and months following 9/11, the U.S. government adopted an aggressive preventative approach to international terrorism. This approach was seen through new legislation, executive branch actions, and in how the government was reorganized with counter-terrorism as the defining priority. The 20th anniversary of 9/11 is an opportunity to examine what lessons we can learn from this post 9/11 approach, from the expansion of government surveillance, to the opening of Guantanamo Bay, to the restructuring of the executive branch.
In 2021, the government and law enforcement’s attention is increasingly on domestic terrorism and the threats of extremist groups here at home. ACS’s focus on the legal legacy of 9/11 asks the questions: How do we avoid repeating the mistakes made in the wake of 9/11 in how this country addresses the threat of domestic extremism? How do we apply the lessons learned from our response to 9/11 to ensure we do not sacrifice civil rights or experience government overreach? Throughout September, we will be releasing new publications, podcast episodes, an issue brief, and hosting a program aimed at answering these questions. Make sure to check back frequently to access new content.
Indefinite Detention: Examining Guantanamo 20 Years After 9/11
Now that American troops have left Afghanistan, the story of the remaining 39 detainees in the United States military prison at Guantanamo Bay Cuba may or may not be coming to an end. The fate of these men is in the hands of both the Biden administration – which states it wants to close the facility – and the judiciary, which is more conservative and more deferential to the executive branch than it was 20 years ago when it granted limited habeas corpus rights to detainees.
What does this changed judiciary and polarized political climate mean for the remaining Guantanamo detainees? Will courts defer to executive branch claims that the U.S. Government can legally detain suspected terrorists after the withdrawal from Afghanistan as the Justice Department claims? If so, what does this say about how – or if – the judiciary will police separation of powers and protect civil liberties in the face of national security claims moving forward? And what is Congress’ role in all of this – what has it done and what should it do?
Russ Feingold, President, ACS
Linda Greenhouse, Clinical Lecturer in Law and a Senior Research Scholar in Law, Yale Law School, Moderator
Baher Azmy, Legal Director, Center for Constitutional Rights
Hina Shamsi, Director of the National Security Project, American Civil Liberties Union
Rita Siemion, Senior Counsel, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee
Steve Vladeck, Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts, University of Texas Austin Law School
- Watch ACS President Russ Feingold on The Majority Report with Sam Seder segment, “9/11 Changed US National Security,” discuss the legacy 9/11 has had on the American national security state, and what to expect going forward.
- Listen to ACS President Russ Feingold on the Wall Street Journal’s Tech News Podcast segment, “Russ Feingold on Surveillance and Privacy,” discuss 9/11’s impact on privacy.
- Listen to ACS President Russ Feingold on the Courthouse News podcast Sidebar, in the segment “Patriots, Politics and Playing for Pay,” discuss how the events on 9/11 reshaped the laws of the United States and led to an enduring debate over government surveillance powers.
- “Invasive and Ineffective: DHS Surveillance Since 9/11,” by Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Deputy Director of the Liberty and National Security Program, Brennan Center for Justice, and Harsha Panduranga Counsel for the Liberty and National Security Program, Brennan Center for Justice
- “The Espionage Act and Media Sources After 9/11,” by Heidi Kitrosser, Robins Kaplan Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Newton N. Minow Visiting Professor, Northwestern University – Pritzker School of Law
- “The Triumph of the Securocracy,” by Emily Berman, Assistant professor, University of Houston Law Center, and Aziz Z. Huq, Frank and Bernice J. Greenberg Professor of Law and Mark Claster Mamolen Teaching Scholar, University of Chicago Law School
- “The Threat We Face is Unbridled Hate,” by Karl A. Racine, District of Columbia Attorney General and President of the National Association of Attorneys General
- “Post-9/11 Reflections on American Military Justice,” by Rachel E. Vanlandingham, Professor of Law, Southwestern Law School
- “Justice in America: The War on Terror’s Damaging Legacy,” by Karen J. Greenberg, Director of the Center on National Security at Fordham Law
- “Can the Militarization of the Police be Justified?” by Barry Friedman, Faculty Director of the Policing Project at New York University School of Law and the Jacob D. Fuchsberg Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of Politics, and Jessica Gillooly, Assistant Professor, Sociology & Criminal Justice Department, Suffolk University
- “The Power of Language in Combating Islamophobia,” by Sahar Aziz, Professor of Law and Chancellor’s Social Justice Scholar at Rutgers University Law School
- “Rethinking our Counterterrorism Framework: How to Address Domestic Terrorism Twenty Years after 9/11,” by Shirin Sinnar, Professor of Law, Stanford Law School
- ACS President Russ Feingold and Director of Policy and Program Debra Perlin are quoted in “How 9/11 Radically Expanded the Power of the U.S. Government” in Time Magazine.
- ACS President Russ Feingold was recently featured on NBC LX’s visual and print package on 9/11.
- In an interview with Gray TV’s national bureau, ACS President Russ Feingold reflects on September 11, 2001.
- “It’s Time to Tear Up the Executive Branch’s Blank Check,” by Russ Feingold, ACS President, for the Brennan Center.