June 13, 2015

Disparate Impact in the Crosshairs

2015 ACS National Convention, 2015 National Convention, disparate impact, Fair Housing Act, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project Inc., Title VI

Hon. Theodore McKee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Begin: 0:00

William Consovoy

Consovoy McCarthy PLLC
Begin: 13:28

Elizabeth Julian

Inclusive Communities Project
Begin: 4:29

Janai Nelson

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Begin: 21:59

Neil S. Siegel

Duke Law School
Begin: 16:28
As structural inequality persists and overt racial animus becomes rarer, the ability to attack policies that have a disproportionately adverse effect on racial and ethnic minorities is crucial. But while the disparate impact doctrine is vitally important for protecting equal opportunity, it is once again in the crosshairs. The Supreme Court has already rejected a private right of action to enforce the disparate impact standard under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and may do so this term under the Fair Housing Act in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project. Conservatives have planned further attacks on disparate impact in other contexts, including employment and voting. How have advocates used the disparate impact standard to confront contemporary racial inequality, and how have litigators adapted to Supreme Court decisions limiting the availability of the disparate impact standard? 
  • Hon. Theodore McKee, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • William Consovoy, Partner, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC
  • Elizabeth Julian, President, Inclusive Communities Project
  • Janai Nelson, Associate Director-Counsel, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
  • Neil S. Siegel, David W. Ichel Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, Co-Director of the Program in Public Law, and Director of the D.C. Summer Institute on Law and Policy, Duke Law School