Episode 145: Insurrection on the Docket

The Supreme Court has taken up three cases that arise out of litigants seeking accountability for the violent events of January 6th. This month, the Court will hear arguments on former president Trump's presidential immunity claim and take a look at whether the law used to prosecute many January 6th participants was validly applied in one such prosecution. Lindsay Langholz speaks with Donald Sherman of CREW about what the Court's decision in Trump v. Anderson, the ballot disqualification case, means for this ongoing pursuit of accountability.

Host: Lindsay Langholz, ACS Senior Director of Policy and Program

Guest: Donald Sherman, Executive Vice President and Chief Counsel, CREW

Links:

• American Historians' Brief
• Children's' Rights Legal Scholars and Advocates Brief
• Colorado lawsuit enforcing Donald Trump's unconstitutional disqualification, CREW

Email the Show: Podcast@ACSLaw.org

Listen on iTunes	Listen on Google	Listen on Spotify	Listen on TuneIn	Listen on Stitcher	Listen on Deezer	Listen on Radio Public

Technical production provided by Flint Stone Media