The American Constitution Society is celebrating our 25th Anniversary and welcoming new ACS President Phil Brest for the premier progressive legal gathering of the year.

The 2026 ACS National Convention will bring together lawyers, law students, judges, scholars, activists, and policymakers to address some of the most urgent and challenging issues confronting our nation. Expect dynamic programming, networking opportunities, and conversations with nationally recognized legal and policy experts.

The hotel deadline has passed, but we encourage you to reach out directly to the Omni Shoreham at (202) 234-0700 to see if they will honor the convention rate. 

National Convention
Thursday, June 18 - Saturday, June 20
Omni Shoreham Hotel
2500 Calvert St NW,
Washington, DC 20008
(202) 234-0700

Registration is now closed. For questions or additional assistance, please contact the convention team at Convention@acslaw.org.

 

 

Featured Speakers

Janai Nelson

Janai Nelson
President and Director-Counsel,
Legal Defense Fund

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse
United States Senator,
Rhode Island

Awards

Lifetime Achievement Award

Fatima Goss Graves

Fatima Goss Graves
President and CEO,
National Women’s Law Center

The Richard D. Cudahy Writing Competition on Regulatory and Administrative Law

Lawyer Winner

Unsettling the Presidency

Leah Litman

Leah Litman
Professor of Law,
University of Michigan Law School

Melissa Murray

Melissa Murray
Frederick I. and Grace Stokes Professor of Law,
New York University School of Law

Katherine Shaw

Katherine Shaw
Professor of Law,
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Over the course of President Trump’s second term, observers have widely noted how the current administration has not only consolidated executive power but also encroached upon Congressional powers. However, little discussion has centered around the Trump Administration’s efforts to seize judicial power. In Unsettling the Presidency, Litman, Murray, and Shaw explore how Trump has utilized the powers of the courts to fashion the presidency into an office where “all constitutional power resides.” Litman, Murray, and Shaw describe how Trump has used both litigation and “ersatz legal processes” to silence critics and further boost executive power.

Student Winner

Redefining Program Integrity: Protecting Consumers and Systems in the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces

Rachael Totz

Rachael Totz
3L,
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

In Redefining Program Integrity: Protecting Consumers and Systems in the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces, Totz dives into unauthorized plan switches and enrollments, common problems plaguing Affordable Care Act marketplaces, which have come at a high price for consumers. These unauthorized switches and enrollments suggest deep failures in the system, particularly in misconceptions related to health benefit program integrity. Totz argues that ACA marketplaces must be assessed through a “consumer protection lens,” connecting consumers to affordable insurance while also ensuring that their rights are protected.


Thursday, June 18, 2026

4:30 to 5:45 p.m. — Ambassador Ballroom

Defending the Rule of Law: The Role of State Attorneys General

With the President of the United States and the U.S Department of Justice asserting authority and making legal arguments at odds with the Constitution and federal law, state attorneys general have stepped into the breach to defend the rule of law and individual rights. Representing the interests of their states, state attorneys general—together and individually—have filed more than 100 lawsuits in the last year-and-a-half to prevent the termination of funding for universities, scientific research, and health programs, defend birthright citizenship, seek an end to the deployment of the National Guard in U.S. cities, and more. They have also worked within their states to secure the rights of their states and people both from federal overreach and regressive state and local policies. What are the current challenges and opportunities for state attorneys general working to defend the rule of law? What challenges are coming down the pike? And how can people outside attorney general offices support this work?

Rob Bonta

Rob Bonta
California Attorney General

Jennifer Davenport

Jennifer Davenport
New Jersey Attorney General

Keith Ellison

Keith Ellison
Minnesota Attorney General

Kristen Clarke

Kristen Clarke
(Moderator)
Former Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Justice

Friday, June 19, 2026

9:30 to 10:45 a.m. — Regency Ballroom

The Imperial Presidency

Checks on executive power have become fully unbalanced, with boundaries and guardrails overrun daily. Congressional leadership unwilling to challenge a president of their own party and an enabling Court have thus far proven largely uninterested in reining in a president who openly defies constitutional and legal constraints on his power. What can be done now to curb executive power and rebalance our branches of federal government? What does accountability look like? How can we avoid such constitutional crises in the future?

Harold Hongju Koh

Harold Hongju Koh
Sterling Professor of International Law, Yale Law School

Barbara McQuade

Barbara McQuade
Professor from Practice, University of Michigan Law School

Hon. Jamie Raskin

Hon. Jamie Raskin
Member, U.S. House of Representatives for the 8th District of Maryland

Donald Sherman

Donald Sherman
President and Chief Executive Officer, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

Vanita Gupta

Vanita Gupta
(Moderator)
Director, Center for Law and Public Trust

11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. — Empire Ballroom

Local Counsel as the Legal Vanguard 

At a time when political and policy fights have become nationalized, state and local counsel have served a critical role in responding to government overreach at every level. As individuals and organizations have been targeted by state and federal actors with sham investigations, maligned with accusations of terrorism or treason, and had their First Amendment rights trampled, they have turned to attorneys in their communities to defend themselves and their work from such brazen attacks. What lessons have been learned by these advocates on the front lines? What work is being done to respond to the moment and prepare for future fights? What can be done to support and bolster this important piece of legal infrastructure?

Susan Lin

Susan Lin
Partner,
Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg, & Lin

Mimi Marziani

Mimi Marziani
Founding Partner,
Marziani, Stevens & Gonzalez PLLC

Elizabeth Wydra

Elizabeth Wydra
President,
Constitutional Accountability Center

Matthew Platkin

Matthew Platkin
(Moderator)
Partner, Platkin LLP

11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. — Ambassador Ballroom

Juneteenth and the Reconstruction Amendments: Pulling the Arc Towards Justice

What does Juneteenth signify today? What lessons can we take from Juneteenth to combat the rise in white nationalism, the actions the current Administration has taken to erase Black historical narratives and the stories of marginalized communities, and the regressive actions of this Court? How do we use the Second Founding and the Reconstruction Amendments to build a more democratic and equitable future? Through this panel, our legal experts will apply the lens of the Reconstruction Amendments and the promise of Juneteenth to the areas of labor, criminal justice, and bodily autonomy, and discuss how we extrapolate this lens even further to build a more just future.

Devon Carbado

Devon Carbado
Elihu Root Professor of Law,
NYU Law School

Michele Goodwin

Michele Goodwin
Linda D. & Timothy J. O’Neill Professor of Constitutional Law and Global Health Policy,
Georgetown Law School; Chair-Elect ACS Board of Directors

Rebecca Zietlow

Rebecca Zietlow
Dean, Distinguished University Professor, the Charles W. Fornoff Professor of Law and Values,
The University of Toledo College of Law

Justin Hansford

Justin Hansford
(Moderator)
Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law
Executive Director, Thurgood Marshall Civil Rights Center

11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. — Regency Ballroom

Ensuring Judicial Independence and Security

There is no rule of law without an independent judiciary. In recent years, sitting and retired federal judges have sounded the alarm on many of the threats facing our judiciary – from defiance of lawful judgments to disinformation campaigns to threats of impeachment and violence. What form are these threats taking and how are they experienced by federal judges? What can the legal profession do to restore trust in our courts and defend judicial independence even as certain courts issue rulings or conduct their affairs in ways we may disagree with? What can be done to protect judges from undue political threats from the executive and legislative branches as well as the increasing number of physical threats they are facing?

Nancy Abudu

Hon. Nancy Abudu
U.S. Circuit Judge,
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Beth Bloom

Hon. Beth Bloom
U.S. District Judge,
Southern District of Florida

Embry J. Kidd

Hon. Embry J. Kidd
U.S. Circuit Judge,
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Shira Sheindlin

Hon. Shira Scheindlin
(Moderator)
U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York (retired)
Of Counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner

1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. — Empire Ballroom

Mobilize for Democracy: Volunteer this Election Year and Beyond

What can law students do to help defend democracy in this year’s elections? In this workshop geared towards law students, attendees will hear about nonpartisan voting rights and election-related volunteer opportunities. The discussion will cover election protection, serving as a poll worker, virtual and in-person opportunities, days of action, and the Election Day Class Cancellation project.

Nicholas Gothard

Nicholas Gothard
Senior National Coordinator, Election Protection,
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

Peggy Li

Peggy Li
Senior Director of Chapters,
American Constitution Society

Katie Waldo

Katie Waldo
Co-Founder & Managing Director,
We The Action

3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. — Ambassador Ballroom

The Democratic Constitution: Recovering the True Meaning of Our Founding Charter

The Constitution, properly interpreted, is fundamentally committed to democracy. And yet, this democracy principle is almost entirely absent from the jurisprudential or popular constitutional discourse. To the contrary, for decades, the conservative legal movement has used the Constitution to degrade democracy, undermine efforts to remedy racial and gender inequality, and facilitate the concentration of economic and political power in the hands of a wealthy few. A conversation has emerged among scholars, lawyers, and movement leaders around a better way of understanding constitutional law and interpretation that starts with centering democracy as the Constitution’s animating principle. Where does the Constitution’s democracy principle come from? What do we gain by recovering the Constitution’s forgotten democratic commitments? And what do we need to do to make this vision a reality?

Matthew J. Ginsburg

Matthew J. Ginsburg
General Counsel,
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)

Risa Goluboff

Risa Goluboff
David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law,
University of Virginia School of Law

Olatunde Johnson

Olatunde Johnson
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ’59 Professor of Law,
Columbia Law School

Reva Siegel

Reva Siegel
Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Professor of Law,
Yale Law School

Jay Swanson

Jay Swanson
(Moderator)
Senior Fellow Project Manager,
Brennan Center

3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. — Empire Ballroom

AI Regulation

For decades, technological advancement has outpaced regulation. This rhythm of innovation first, guardrails second has created a power dynamic that often leaves lawmakers playing catch-up and judges confronting complicated legal questions as technology collides with constitutional rights without the benefit of clear legislation or guidance. What reforms can be made to bring meaningful oversight and protections to tools powerful enough to reshape society? How can progressives approach regulating AI and other emerging technologies in a way that keeps pace with advancement? What should the regulations on AI look like and who should be responsible for enforcement? What would a public agenda for AI look like?

Lauren McFerran

Lauren McFerran
Executive Director,
AFL-CIO Tech Institute

Benjamin Merkle

Benjamin Merkel
Public Policy and Government Relations Manager,
Anthropic

Danyelle Solomon

Danyelle Solomon
Senior Director, U.S. AI Policy,
Microsoft

Asad Ramzanali

Asad Ramzanali
(Moderator)
Director of AI & Technology Policy,
Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator, Vanderbilt University

3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. — Regency Ballroom

For the United States: Rebuilding Independence at the Department of Justice

The Department of Justice is in crisis. The bedrock principle of non-interference, once held sacrosanct by administrations of both parties, has been jettisoned. The Attorney General has directed the Department to represent the President and his agenda above all else. Thousands of attorneys and professionals have left or been forced out as leadership pursues personal and political grudges at the President’s open direction. What reforms can be instituted to restore the department’s independence? What can be done by Congress or outside organizations to bring oversight to the abuses taking place within the department? What can future administrations do to restore the Department’s professionalism and reputation?

Rupa Bhattacharyya

Rupa Bhattacharyya
Legal Director,
Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection
Georgetown Law

Stuart Delery

Stuart Delery
Partner, Gibson Dunn

Stacey Young

Stacey Young
Founder & Executive Director,
Justice Connection

Rachel Rossi

Rachel Rossi
(Moderator)
President, Alliance for Justice

4:15 to 5:45 p.m. — Regency Ballroom

State Courts as Champions of Rights

For the last several years, progressives have increasingly turned to state courts and state constitutions to protect individual rights in a time of federal retrenchment and check the rapidly expanding overreach of the federal government. How has this pivot to the states been working and what could be done to strengthen these critical institutions? What should practitioners know as they navigate these dynamics?

Susan Crawford

Hon. Susan Crawford
Justice, Wisconsin Supreme Court

Anita Earls

Hon. Anita Earls
Associate Justice, North Carolina Supreme Court

Karl Procaccini

Hon. Karl Procaccini
Associate Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court

Samuel Harbourt

Samuel Harbourt
(Moderator)
California Solicitor General

Saturday, June 20, 2026

9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. — Ambassador Ballroom

Bringing the Constitution to the Classroom

As Christian nationalists push to inject religion into public schools, ACS has released lesson plans on the Separation of Church and State and the U.S. Constitution to bring important civic education to primary and secondary students throughout the country. How can younger students most effectively engage with constitutional principles? What has worked best for volunteers in years’ past? This interactive workshop will empower participants to teach the Constitution in the Classroom curriculum in schools within their communities and bring the program to their chapter.

Catherine Gima

Catherine Gima
Senior Director of Legal Programs & Networking,
Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Rebecca Markert

Rebecca Markert
Vice President and Legal Director,
Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Stephanie Snow

Stephanie Snow
Co-chair,
ACS Chicago Lawyer Chapter

Ashley Erickson

Ashley Erickson
(Moderator)
Senior Director of Network Advancement,
American Constitution Society

9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. — Diplomat Ballroom

Voting Rights After Callais

For over a decade, the Roberts Court has whittled away the power of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), one of the most successful pieces of civil rights legislation in our nation’s history. Now, pro-democracy proponents are regrouping after the Court’s demolition of the VRA in Louisiana v. Callais. How can meaningful political representation be achieved in the face of open hostility from a conservative supermajority on the Court? What does voting rights litigation look like in a post-VRA world? Are there meaningful reforms to be enacted at the local, state, or national level to mitigate the impact of the loss of Section 2?

Adam Lioz

Adam Lioz
Senior Policy Counsel,
Legal Defense Fund

Jenny Ma

Jenny Ma
Director of Civil Rights Hub,
Public Rights Project

Leonard Powell

Leonard Powell
Staff Attorney,
Native American Rights Fund

Lindsay Langholz

Lindsay Langholz
(Moderator)
Vice President of Policy and Program,
American Constitution Society

11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. — Regency Ballroom

Staying in the Fight

When we fight, we win. Across the country, progressive victories have been achieved in courtrooms, in city halls and state legislatures, on campuses, and in the streets through solidarity and a refusal to comply in advance with authoritarian tactics and pressure. What has worked and what else can be done? What role can lawyers and law students play in their communities and in their practice to defend the rule of law? At a time of growing frustration, how can we best engage with the fight for real reform while working within the system?

Phil Brest

Phil Brest
President,
American Constitution Society

Taylor Brown

Taylor Brown
Director,
NYC Mayor’s Office of LGBTQIA+ Affairs

Kalpana Kotagal

Kalpana Kotagal
Commissioner,
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Alice O’Brien

Alice O’Brien
General Counsel,
National Education Association

Chris Geidner

Chris Geidner
(Moderator)
Publisher and Author,
Law Dork

 

Schedule is subject to change.

Thursday, June 18

9:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
General Coffee/Tea Service
Empire Foyer
9:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m.
Quiet Room
Director’s Room
10:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
Student Retreat
Empire Ballroom
12:00–1:00 p.m.
Student Activity
National Portrait Gallery Atrium
1:00–3:00 p.m.
Lawyer Chapter Leader/Path to the Bench Working Group Meeting
Empire Ballroom
3:00–6:00 p.m.
General Coffee/Tea Service
Regency Gallery
3:30–8:00 p.m.
Registration & Help Desk Open
West Registration Desk
4:30–5:45 p.m.
Plenary Panel: Defending the Rule of Law: The Role of State Attorneys General
Ambassador Ballroom
5:45–6:45 p.m.
Welcome Reception
Regency Gallery & Ambassador Ballroom
7:00–8:30 p.m.
Welcome Dinner
Regency Ballroom

 

Friday, June 19

7:30–9:15 a.m.
Next Generation Leaders Breakfast (by invitation only)
Ambassador Ballroom
9:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
General Coffee/Tea Service
Regency Gallery
9:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m.
Registration & Help Desk Open
West Registration Desk
9:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m.
Quiet Room
Director’s Room
9:30–10:45 a.m.
Plenary Panel: The Imperial Presidency
Regency Ballroom
11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
Morning Breakout Sessions:

– Local Counsel as the Legal Vanguard
Empire Ballroom
– Juneteenth and the Reconstruction Amendments: Pulling the Arc Towards Justice
Ambassador Ballroom
– Ensuring Judicial Independence and Security
Regency Ballroom
12:15–2:00 p.m.
Practice Group Lunches
Ambassador & Regency Ballrooms
1:30–2:30 p.m.
Student Workshop: Mobilize for Democracy: Volunteer this Election Year and Beyond
Empire Ballroom
2:45–5:45 p.m.
General Coffee/Tea Service
Regency Gallery
3:00–4:00 p.m.
Afternoon Breakout Sessions:

– The Democratic Constitution: Recovering the True Meaning of Our Founding Charter
Ambassador Ballroom
– AI Regulation
Empire Ballroom
– For the United States: Rebuilding Independence at the Department of Justice
Regency Ballroom
4:15–5:45 p.m.
Plenary Panel: State Courts as Champions of Rights
Regency Ballroom
5:45–6:05 p.m.
Oath Retaking Ceremony & Closing Remarks
Regency Ballroom
6:05–7:05 p.m.
Closing Reception
Empire Ballroom & Patio
7:30–9:30 p.m.
Happy Hour hosted by the Washington, DC Lawyer Chapter
Mission DuPont, 1606 20th Street NW, Washington, DC

 

Saturday, June 20

8:30–9:15 a.m.
Ask Me Anything with ACS Student Leaders + Undergraduate Students
Empire Patio
9:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
Registration & Help Desk Open
West Registration Desk
9:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m.
General Coffee/Tea Service
Regency Gallery
9:30–10:30 a.m.
Workshop: Bringing the Constitution to the Classroom
Ambassador Ballroom
9:30–10:30 a.m.
Breakout Session: Voting Rights After Callais
Regency Ballroom
11:00 a.m.–12:30 p.m.
Plenary Panel: Staying in the Fight
Regency Ballroom

 

Learn more about sponsorship opportunities.
Become a sponsor »


Practice Group Sponsor

Covington
DLA Piper
Jenner & Block
Kirkland & Ellis
Lieff Cabraser
Sullivan & Cromwell

Benefactor

AFSCME
BakerHostetler
Brennan Center for Justice
Compassion & Choices
Keker, Van Nest & Peters
National Education Association
Robins Kaplan LLP
Susman Godfrey
WilmerHale

Collective Impact

Graybill Law Firm, PC
Kaplan Law Firm
Law Forward
Lowell & Associates
MS&G

Patron

AFT
Akin
Alliance for Justice
Americans United
Constitutional Accountability Center
Foley & Lardner
Freedom From Religion Foundation
HSPRD
Loevy & Loevy
National LGBTQ+ Bar Association
Reproductive Freedom for All
Service Employees International Union
SPLC
UNITE HERE

If you have questions about sponsoring the 2026 ACS National Convention, please contact Carlye Gibson Rooney, Vice President of Development, via email at cgibsonrooney@acslaw.org.

 

Scholarships
Applications for scholarships to attend the 2026 Convention are now closed. If you have any scholarship-related questions, please email Campus@acslaw.org.

Continuing Legal Education (CLE)
ACS has applied for CLE credit in several jurisdictions. The availability and amount of CLE credit may vary. CLE Resources.

Note that during each Convention session where CLE is available, the moderator will provide two codes, which you will have to enter into this form to verify your participation.

ACS will update the list below as it receives approvals:

Approved:

  • Arizona – 8.5 credits
  • Arkansas – 8.5 credits
  • California – 8.5 credits
  • Delaware – 8.5 credits
  • Florida – 10 credits
  • Georgia – 8.5 credits
  • Illinois – 8.5 credits
  • Indiana – 8.5 credits
  • Kansas – 10 credits
  • Minnesota – 8.5 credits
  • Missouri – 10.2 credits
  • New York – 10.2 credits
  • Nevada – 8.5 credits
  • New Jersey – 10.2 credits
  • Ohio – 8.5 credits
  • Oregon – 8.5 credits
  • Pennsylvania – 8.5 credits
  • Texas – 8.5 credits
  • Tennessee – 8.5 credits
  • Washington – 8.5
  • West Virginia – 10.2 credits
  • Wisconsin – 10 credits

Additional states pending. Check back for updates. 

If you have further questions about CLE, please contact us at Convention@acslaw.org.