March 21, 2013

A Conversation with Gideon Supreme Court Clerks, Litigators, and Scholars


Caroline Fredrickson

President, American Constitution Society for Law and Policy
Begin: 0:01

Peter B. Edelman

Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center; Chair, ACS Board of Directors
Begin: 5:05

Abe Krash

Retired Partner, Arnold & Porter
Begin: 12:26

Robert M. O’Neil

Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Virginia School of Law
Begin: 16:50

Stephen Wermiel

Fellow in Law and Government, American University Washington College of Law
Begin: 28:09

David D. Cole

Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Begin: 35:02

Questions and Discussion

97:23

On Thursday, March 21, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy hosted “Considering Gideon at 50: The History and Future of Indigent Defense.”  In the 1963 Gideon v. Wainwright decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.”  It was this unanimous decision, in an opinion authored by Justice Hugo Black, that gave true meaning to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  However, 50 years after this landmark decision, this country has fallen short of what is required of it by the Constitution.  Three-quarters of the public defender’s offices in the country have caseloads which exceed recommended caseload standards.  Some defenders are handling 500 felony cases per year when the American Bar Association advises they handle no more than 150.  In some jurisdictions, prosecuting attorney offices’ budgets are three times those of public defender offices’.  And in the midst of state budget crises, some offices have been forced to fire defenders. 

How far have we strayed from the Supreme Court’s intent in Gideon?  Have the Supreme Court’s right to counsel cases over the past 50 years been in the spirit of Gideon?  What was the historical, constitutional, and legal context in which the Supreme Court reached its unanimous decision in Gideon?  How do we respond to the contemporary indigent defense crisis?  Panelists discussed these and other questions throughout the symposium.

Introductory Remarks (10:00 a.m.):
Caroline Fredrickson, President, American Constitution Society for Law and Policy

Symposium featured:

A Conversation with Gideon Supreme Court Clerks, Litigators, and Scholars (10:10 a.m. – 11:40 a.m.):

  • Moderator, Peter B. Edelman, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center; Chair, American Constitution Society for Law and Policy Board of Directors
  • David D. Cole, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
  • Abe Krash, Retired Partner, Arnold & Porter
  • Robert M. O’Neil, Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Virginia School of Law
  • Stephen Wermiel, Fellow in Law and Government, American University Washington College of Law