Federal judicial selection

  • February 19, 2014
    In an interview with NPR’s Robert Siegel and Audie Cornish, Daniel Webster—Director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research—discusses the grave consequences that followed Missouri’s 2007 repeal of a law requiring background checks for gun buyers.
    President Obama continues to face criticism concerning the diversity of his judicial nominees. MSNBC’s Adam Serwer reports on growing liberal concern surrounding the president’s judicial nominees in Georgia.
    Ta-Nehisi Coates of The Atlantic reflects on the Jordan Davis murder, eloquently identifying racism in America as “not merely a belief system but a heritage.”
    A group of legal organizations are using television advertising to push the issue of court transparency at the Supreme Court. Josh Gerstein of Politico has the story.
    At CAC’s Text & History Blog, Tom Donnelly shares “six reasons to keep an eye on the Greenhouse Gas Cases.”
    Matt Bodie at Prawfs Blawg argues in favor of incentivizing cheaper law school course material.
  • February 18, 2014
    In an article for the The Orange County Register, Erwin Chemerinsky, Faculty Advisor for the University of California Irvine School of Law ACS Student Chapter, explains why the upcoming decision of Harris v. Quinn could pose a threat to public employee unions.
    Volkswagen workers at a Chattanooga, Tennessee plant announced their decision last Friday not to join the United Automobile Workers. Steve Greenhouse of The New York
    Times reports on the possibility of a German-style works council in 
    Chattanooga and what it could mean for Volkswagen and the UAW.
    At the CPRBlog, Thomas McGarity and Matt Shudtz examine the legal concessions made by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in a policy proposal that protects workers from silica dust exposure.
    Writing for The Daily Beast, Jamelle Bouie discusses the Michael Dunn murder trial and the racial consequences of Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law.
    Mark Sherman of The Associated Press notes how President Obama’s judicial appointees are shaping the discussion on same-sex marriage in Virginia.
    Writing for The Root, Henry Louis Gates Jr. explains why the race of a mythical princess continues to play a role in the study of black history.
  • February 3, 2014
    Guest Post
    by Richard W. Painter, S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law, University of Minnesota Law School; former Associate Counsel to the President and Chief Ethics Lawyer, White House Counsel's Office (2005-2007); co-author of the ACS Issue Brief, “Extraordinary Circumstances: The Legacy of the Gang of 14 and a Proposal for Judicial Nominations"
    Senator Rubio of Florida is now one of the strongest contenders in the GOP for president. He is qualified and likeable and thus far has a clean record on ethics. One or more of Rubio’s Senate colleagues also might have a shot at the nomination. There are other good candidates as well. And Republicans, if they can get their act together, have a very good chance of electing a president in 2016. 
    One of the most important things a new president will do is appoint judges, the job that our current president has been trying to do for the past five years. The president will need the advice and consent of the Senate to make these appointments, but courts need judges, and presidents and senators have an obligation to make sure vacancies on courts are filled.
    And the place where senators should care most about filling judicial vacancies should be their own home states. The interests of constituents in access to judges and justice should be a priority over playing partisan politics.
    And this is why, until recently, it usually was not a problem for the Senate to allow home state senators an informal veto—implemented through the so called “blue slip” process—over confirmation of judges in their own states. Senators might try to block nominees from other states with filibusters and other tactics, but would protect their own constituents by working out a deal with the White House for nomination and confirmation of an acceptable nominee in their state.      
  • January 17, 2014
    This week saw a flurry of action on the judicial nominations front.
    On Monday, January 13, the Senate confirmed Robert Wilkins to the D.C. Circuit with a vote of 55-43. With his confirmation, the D.C. Circuit is fully staffed for the first time since 1991.
    On Thursday, January 16, the Senate Judiciary Committee held votes on 29 nominees, including nine nominees who had already been reported out last year.  All 29 nominees were voted out of Committee, including several with connections to ACS’s network. No votes by the full Senate have been set. Quick action, however, could cut the judicial vacancy rate by one-third. The nominees voted out of Committee are:
    • Carolyn B. McHugh, Tenth Circuit, Voice Vote
    • John B. Owens, Ninth Circuit, Voice Vote
    • Michelle T. Friedland, Ninth Circuit, Roll Call Vote, 14-3
    • Nancy L. Moritz, Tenth Circuit, Voice Vote
    • David Jeremiah Barron, First Circuit, Call Vote, 10-8
    • Jeffrey Alker Meyer, District of Connecticut, Voice Vote
    • Timothy L. Brooks, Western District of Arkansas, Voice Vote
    • James Donato, Northern District of California, Voice Vote
    • Beth Labson Freeman, Northern District of California, Voice Vote
    • Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez, District of Puerto Rico, Voice Vote
    • Pamela L. Reeves, Eastern District of Tennessee, Voice Vote
    • Vince Girdhari Chhabria, Northern District of California, Roll Call Vote, 13-5
    • James Maxwell Moody, Jr., Eastern District of Kansas, Vote
    • Matthew Frederick Leitman, Eastern District of Michigan, Voice Vote
    • Judith Ellen Levy, Eastern District of Michigan, Voice Vote
    • Laurie J. Michelson, Eastern District of Michigan, Voice Vote
    • Linda Vivienne Parker, Eastern District of Michigan, Roll Call Vote, 14-3
    • Christopher Reid Cooper, District of Columbia, Voice Vote
    • M. Douglas Harpool, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Voice Vote
    • Gerald Austin McHugh, Jr., Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Roll Call Vote, 12-5
    • Edward G. Smith, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Voice Vote
    • Sheryl H. Lipman, Western District of Tennessee, Voice Vote
    • Stanley Allen Bastian, Eastern District of Washington, Voice Vote
    • Manish S. Shah, Northern District of Illinois, Voice Vote
    • Daniel D. Crabtree, District of Kansas, Voice Vote
    • Cynthia Ann Bashant, Southern District California, Voice Vote
    • Jon David Levy, District of Maine, Roll Call Vote, 15-2
    • Theodore David Chuang, District of Maryland, Roll Call Vote, 10-8
    • George Jarrod Hazel, District of Maryland, Voice Vote
  • January 10, 2014
    Happy 2014. With the New Year comes a renewed hope of expediency in the judicial nomination and confirmation process. The pace of progress, however, remains to be seen.
    Before the Senate recessed in December, it failed to pass a resolution by unanimous consent that would have allowed the existing judicial nominations to be held over until 2014. As a result, 55 nominees were returned the White House. Robert Wilkins, nominated to the D.C. Circuit, was the only nominee not returned, because the procedural status of his nomination allowed him to be held over without unanimous consent. Cloture was invoked on his nomination on January 9, and a final vote is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. on Monday, January 13.
    On January 6, President Obama re-nominated 54 of the nominees whose names were returned to the White House in December. All of these nominees were returned to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Those who already had a confirmation hearing do not have to repeat the hearing process, but all nominees, including those voted out of Committee last year, must be voted out onto the Senate floor.
    The only candidate not re-nominated was William Thomas, who had been nominated to the Southern District of Florida. His nomination was dropped because of opposition from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who had previously supported Thomas. Had he been confirmed, Thomas would have been the first openly gay African American federal judge.
    On January 8, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing for three nominees: James D. Peterson (W.D. Wis), Nancy J. Rosenstengel (S.D. Ill.) and Indira Talwani (D. Mass.).
    On January 9, the Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to vote on 29 nominees, including nine who were voted out of Committee in 2013. At the request of Sen. Grassley (R-Iowa), all nominees were held over. The votes are now set for January 16.