Texas Public School Teacher Sees ‘Mark of Beast’ in Fingerprinting Mandate
-
Citing her religiou
s beliefs, a Texas public school teacher is fighting a state law that requires teachers to be fingerprinted. Pam McLaurin, a kindergarten teacher in the Big Sandy Independent School District outside Houston, said that fingerprinting represents a sign of the beast, a reference to the Bible's book of Revelation.
Revelation states that people who worship "the beast and his image and receives his mark on his forehead or on his right hand," shall draw God's wrath. McLaurin's attorney says the law, which could prompt the teacher's dismissal, violates her First Amendment free exercise of religion right. The attorney, Scott Skelton, told Wired that McLaurin firmly believes that computerized fingerprinting is the mark of the beast referenced in Revelation. "This law prohibits the free exercise of her religion," he told Wired.
The Texas Education Agency has told Big Sandy school officials that McLaurin would be barred from teaching if she doesn't get fingerprinted. Wired notes that McLaurin's lawsuit is similar to one lodged by a group of Michigan farmers against a state requirement to tag livestock with RFID chips. The group claims the tagging would represent a demonic mark.
George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley lightly examines McLaurin's lawsuit on his blog. He notes:
Fingerprinting does not leave a mark on your hand or forehead. It leaves it on a piece of paper that is then digitized. Under this bizarre interpretation, any ink, lotion, or impression left by McLaurin's fingers could constitute a sign of the Beast. However, she is willing to take a photo and presumably a optic scanner or other imagining picture. Thus, what if the state simply takes a picture of her fingerprints directly on a digitized scanner? How is that different from asking her to take a high-resolution picture?
- Fingerprinting
- First Amendment
- First Amendment
- mark of beast
- Pam McLaurin
- Religion clauses
- Religious liberty









I would agree that the world is moving toward the mark of the beast, but not in this school district. We know from Revelations that the time will come when this will be a reality. This situation, however, does not create a mark on the body. Let's worry about other things. casino online
While I think that Ms McLaurins' arguments are totally off the mark, I'm curious as to why the Texas Education Agency is so determined to finger print teachers. It sounds like they're pushing the envelope here for no good reason
Biometrics is the issue here. Data collection that can later be used as Identification Authentication in a fashion that as Christians we can see directly tied to what is called the Mark of the Beast. Perhaps if we substituted the word mark with system more would understand that.
Biometric Fingerprinting is Hand Geometry that is calculated by measuring the lines within the perameters of the fingerprint, which essentially is the Measurement of Man. In turn you get the Number of a Man.The other number that is of concern is what is called a UIN. That stand for Unique identification Number.
Is the Mark a thing? Or a System?
The Mark isn't a tattoo, or even a chip It's not even about "666". It is a Complete System: “The Mark has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The stress on identity is just a component for all the other components."
Finally, after a year of headlines we are beginning to see the clear picture at hand when it comes to Nandan Nilekani's vision for issuing every Indian a UIN, Unique Identification Number. At first glance it would have been thought is was nothing much, possibly a variation on the US's Social Security Number. At closer inspection however, you can see many layers that one would not have imagined. Nandan Nilekani co-founded Infosys, one of India's leading information technology companies, back in 1981. After serving as its president and then CEO, he's now joined the Indian government to help lead a massive new IT project: Providing every Indian with a unique identity card. concentrate on his next great endeavor: Re-imagining India in the new millennium.
In recent weeks it has been revealed that Mr. Nilekani seeks to monetized the UIN as well as have it directly linked to ones biometrics, which would include all 10 fingerprints. Last week through the National Population Register (NPR) it was announced that the 2011 Census requirements of biometric fingerprints was to help target each person for various programs and schemes and link them directly to a system that would offer “real time population data”. This project also aims to give 1.2 billion citizens biometric identity cards that will have the ability to help millions of poor gain access to many services they otherwise would not be able to. Think about it, “To obtain the pension, the beneficiary has to implant his finger impression on a device with a business correspondent engaged by the bank and only if the impression matches with the one to whom a bio-metric card has been issued, then only the amount is released,” said SBI bank official.
Identification has always been a huge problem for India with many persons never identified from birth. Whole households with no means to identify themselves. This effects them on every level from the simple things like the purchase of a cell phone to the more useful and important services as opening a bank account, seeking employment . In most cases an address cannot be verified either because the poor live in slums or on the streets and have nothing to provide to prove who or where they are from. "This project is pro-poor and inclusive targeted mainly towards the poor. The middle class and the rich have some form of identity. People on the margins are getting lost because of lack of identity," Mr Nilekani said.
Mr. Nilekani's intention is to provide access to all persons state benefits that before only had available to those with means. Money. The whole idea is to include everyone into the System. Meaning everyone. This does not verify ones citizenship, but residency. This number will be issued from cradle to grave with no possibly of duplication. Hence for added measure the inclusion of biometrics. It has been said that India's efforts at giving every citizen an identity number is possibly one of the greatest challenges facing the government. What could this mean? Universal Financial Inclusion in India. Bank access, health insurance for all.
Nilekani is not alone in this venture, in fact he has some pretty impressive partners that seek their piece of the pie. IBM for one, and none other then Bill Gates of Microsoft. In August IBM began dialogue with partners in India to position itself in the project and shortly before Mr. Gates met with Nandan Nilekani to ensure his part in this monumental scheme. "The World Bank has offered to assist the government in re-structuring the Public Distribution System (PDS), the Delhi government is set to soon initiate a pilot project to launch its ‘cash for food’ program in the Capital. This is seen as the first step in overhauling the system." It would seem absolutely nothing should go wrong, with a Dream Team such as this put together .
In India in another three to four years, you will be known not by name, but by a unique identity (UID) number. Will this set a precedent for the rest of the world in the near future? Or have we already seen similar projects in other countries that could strip our identity and we become nothing more then a bit of information assimilated into a system. I know I have my opinion. Hopefully as this information begins to sink in, you will begin to see a bigger picture.
Post new comment