Constitutional Interpretation and Change
Ideological conservatives have been quite successful in promoting neutral-sounding theories of constitutional interpretation, such as originalism and strict construction, and in criticizing judges with whom they disagree as judicial activists who make up law instead of interpreting it. The Constitutional Interpretation and Change Issue Group works to debunk the neutrality of those theories and expose misleading criticisms. It also articulates effective and accessible methods of interpretation to give full meaning to the guarantees contained in the Constitution.
The Issue Group's Co-Chairs are:
To get involved in the work of the Constitutional Interpretation and Change Issue Group, please fill out the Issue Group Sign-Up Form.
Also, please note that ACS ResearchLink features a number of topics related to the Constitutional Interpretation and Change Issue Group’s work on which law students are encouraged to focus their academic scholarship.
The Issue Group's Co-Chairs are:
- Jack Balkin, Yale Law School
- Rebecca Brown, Vanderbilt University Law School
- Andrew Pincus, Mayer Brown LLP
To get involved in the work of the Constitutional Interpretation and Change Issue Group, please fill out the Issue Group Sign-Up Form.
Also, please note that ACS ResearchLink features a number of topics related to the Constitutional Interpretation and Change Issue Group’s work on which law students are encouraged to focus their academic scholarship.
