Former Senate Judiciary Committee Lawyer Slams Senators Over Attacks on Thurgood Marshall

June 30, 2010
A group of Republican Senate Judiciary Committee members, as noted in this blog post, attacked the work of Thurgood Marshall, the former Supreme Court justice and towering civil rights leader during the opening day of the Elena Kagan Supreme Court confirmation hearings. The senators' broadsides of Marshall continue to draw sharp rebuttals.

As noted by The New York Times, "Justice Thurgood Marshall, who as a lawyer argued the Brown case [Brown v. Board Education, which invalidated segregation in schools], has emerged as a dominant figure in the hearings. Ms. Kagan clerked for him, and Republicans, led by Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona, have attacked Justice Marshall as a liberal ‘activist' and expressed concerns about Ms. Kagan's association with him."

In a column for The Washington Post, Stephanie J. Jones knocks Sens. Kyl, Jeff Sessions and John Cornyn for their over-the-top and wildly unfair remarks.

Jones, the former executive director of the National Urban League Policy Institute and a former chief Senate Judiciary Committee counsel, writes:

Let me put it plainly, senators: Far from being the out-of-the mainstream caricature you seek to create, Thurgood Marshall deserves your unyielding gratitude and respect. Among other things, he saved this nation from a second civil war.

...

Marshall stood up for the rights of millions of ordinary Americans who, were it not for him, would have continued to be second-class citizens, unable to vote, attend state universities or share public accommodations by virtue of the color of their skin. This would have been a very different nation - had it even survived.

[image via cliff1066]

Your point on the civil war

Your point on the civil war is completely wrong. To say that you should have let the south go its own way and not engaged in the human tragedy term paper service Heated Gloves that is very painful. It is very smart and creative.

noncompete

Companies in rapidly changing industries face a delicate SurvivalBooth balancing act when crafting enforceable noncompete agreements for employees.

I to watch together and bond

I to watch together and bond over. We were both very happy that Pentatonix won, and were also happy for all the groups that did paper writer so well. Last season we were huge fans of Street Corner Symphony.

On that basis, it's a wise

On that basis, it's a wise course of action that can manage a lot of these agreements that may circumstances where these are needed, demonstrates Beck. Above this specific, "enforce every one of agreements equally, methods to pin down a study subject or simply a legal courts is going to take which straight into consideration" whilst deciding getting in touch with carry out the contested One particular, he recommends Blog.

For that reason, it is a wise

For that reason, it is a wise course of action that will control a lot of these contracts that will conditions in which they're just needed, shows Beck brooklyn. Above this, "enforce all of arrangements evenly, ways to pin down a research subject or possibly a courts will take which in to consideration" while deciding calling implement your contested 1, the guy suggests.

Therefore, it is a good idea

Therefore, it is a good idea to limit these agreements to situations where they are really necessary, says Beck. Beyond that, "enforce all agreements equally, how to narrow down a research topic or a court may take that into consideration" when deciding whether to enforce a contested one, he advises.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.