Sen. Franken: Conservatives Have Mangled Constitutional Discourse

June 18, 2010

Helping to kick off the 2010 ACS National Convention, Sen. Al Franken criticized Republican efforts to scuttle the Obama administration's nominations to the federal courts and numerous administration positions. 

"Tonight, we celebrate the rise of a new generation of progressive legal scholars and jurists," Franken said. "Look to your left. Look to your right. Odds are, at least one of the three of you will someday be filibustered by Senate Republicans. Speaking of which, I'd like to give a special shout-out to all the filibustered nominees we have here with us tonight. The Republican obstruction that is standing between you and the work you've agreed to do for your country is unacceptable. And we will continue to fight it."

Franken, the featured speaker at the Convention's opening night Gala dinner at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C, followed Dawn Johnsen, who was nominated by President Obama to lead the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). A transcript of Franken's speech is available here.

Franken said, "In particular, I want to recognize Dawn Johnsen, who should be the head of the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice. What Republicans have done to keep you from doing that important job is reprehensible."

The senator also took a sharp look at the conservative wing of the U.S. Supreme Court and its rulings that have consistently supported corporate interests.

"I don't think you need to be a lawyer to recognize that the Roberts Court has, consistently and intentionally, protected and promoted the interests of the powerful over those of individual Americans," Franken said. "And you certainly don't need to be a lawyer to understand what that means for the working people who are losing their rights, one 5-4 decision at a time.

"Tonight," Franken continued, "I'd like to talk about how we got to this sad moment in American legal history - because it didn't happen by accident. Conservative activists - led by the Federalist Society - have waged a remarkably successful battle to re-shape our legal discourse, and thus our legal system. And they're not done yet. I should acknowledge up front that this story is kind of a downer.

"But there's good news: the ending has not yet been written," he continued. "And I really believe that, if we pay attention to how things got so bad, we'll learn how to make them better."

Specifically, conservative jurists, lawmakers and activists have pushed a cramped understanding of constitutional interpretation, Franken said.

"If you listen to the U.S. Senate talk about judicial nominees, you'd be forgiven for thinking that originalism was a time-honored American value, one of the things we fought the British to protect," Franken said. "But ironically enough, originalism - like the designated hitter - only dates back a few decades.

"Indeed, as Cass Sunstein has pointed out, it was Robert Bork who first popularized the notion that the Constitution should be interpreted according to what we believe was the ‘original understanding' of its authors," he continued. "Just to clarify: That's not Robert Bork the Founding Father. That's Robert Bork the 20th century conservative legal activist.

"Originalism isn't a pillar of our Constitutional history," Franken maintained. "It's a talking point. During his confirmation hearing, John Roberts broke out another conservative talking point. He said: ‘Judges are like umpires. Umpires don't make the rules; they apply them.' And he promised: ‘I will remember that it's my job to call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat.'"

"How ridiculous. Judges are nothing like umpires."

Instead, Franken cited former Justice David Souter who said, "The first lesson, simple as it is, is that whatever court we're in, whatever we are doing, at the end of our task some human being is going to be affected."

But conservatives, Franken said, "would like us to forget this lesson."

Our constitutional discourse, Franken continued, has been so mangled by conservatives that one could be forgiven for believing that court rulings "don't matter to ordinary people, but only to the undeserving riff-raff at the margins of society."

Watch Franken's entire speech below:

Th ending has not yet been written.

yeah that's right, what Franken observed on good news. We all can hope for that, there sure is good news. Like he said, if we look to how things got bad and are in the condition, now, however good we are looking to it and getting it, the best can we make it better. I love that.
People, I found something worth reading here. I say that since we all know we have lot people around us having prostate disorders. Many don't know the right way to handle the condition, but they instead go along medications that does nothing but lose their money and put them in agony. My friend just referred me on an ongoing super beta prostate scam and we thought that to be true. But today Even that we heard the first place super beta prostate scam, that's not really the thing that looks like. The page explains the same very clear and crystal. Don't forget to check it out, gladly recommend it if you know someone with a prostate trouble.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.