Over the weekend, Marty Lederman of Georgetown Law and Cass Sunstein of the University of Chicago Law School exchanged insights on Balkinization about the implications of the Hamdan decision on the Administration's NSA Domestic Surveillance Program. The conversation begins with Professor Lederman's entry last Friday, suggesting that "the Hamdan decision fairly decisively undermines whatever slight plausibility (the administration's) argument might previously have enjoyed." Thoughts from both authors are available below.
-Marty Lederman's original post, Friday, July 7th-Cass Sunstein's reply, Saturday, July 8th-Marty Lederman's reply, Sunday, July 9th-Cass Sunstein's closing post, Sunday, July 9th.
BookTalkACS BookTalk features posts by authors of books on pressing law or policy concerns. Click here to catch up on the latest.
Join ACSFeatured VideosEmail SignupFind a Lawyer Chapter or Student ChapterBlogrollLegal BlogsPolicy Blogs |
|
Post new comment