Federal Court Says Torrent Sites Run Afoul of Copyright Law

December 29, 2009
Wired's David Kravets notes a "landmark" federal court decision of last week that a string of torrent Web sites are unlawful, allowing for massive copyright infringements. Wired said the Dec. 21 decision, while not unexpected, is "the first in the United in which a federal judge found that" torrent or BitTorrent Web search engines are "an unlawful avenue to free movies, music, videogames and software."

The lawsuit was lodged by Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and resulted in a summary judgment ruling against www.isohunt.com, www.torrentbox.com, www.podtropolis.com and www.ed2k-it.com, all owned by Gary Fung. The plaintiffs, U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson wrote, "asserted that, through his operation and promotion of the websites, Fung allows users to download infringing copies of popular movies, television shows, sound recordings, software programs, video games, and other copyrighted content free of charge. "

Judge Wilson dismissed Fung's arguments that his sites were distinguishable from other file-sharing sites that have been shuttered for copyright infringements, such as Napster.

The judge wrote in Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Fung:

These technological details are, at their core, indistinguishable from previous technologies. In fact, Defendants' technologies appear to improve upon the previous technologies by permitting faster downloads are large files such as movies. Such an improvement quite obviously increases the potential for copyright infringement.

Fung told Wired that he was considering an appeal, maintaining that provisions in copyright law should protect Torrent sites that remove content when requested by rights-holders.

[Image via the Law Office of Lisa N. Kaufman.]

Pyrrhic Victory

Even if many of these torrent sites are shut down i really doubt that this is going to be the end of media piracy. im pretty sure piratebay is still going to be up and running and the owners of that site are in jail i believe. what is all of this accomplishing? napster was shut down in 2001. nobody is making the case that music sharing is decreasing or that any dent at all has been made. the industry has gotten million plus judgments against housewives and seventeen year old kids. they have to figure out something new because suing the site owners isnt worth the cost of litigation.

Glad

I am actually glad that a judge found these sites to be copyright infringements. I hope that they will be shut down. No artist should have their work stolen like that. What good is it to get something for free when it is actually stealing? casino online

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.