By Nkechi Taifa, a senior policy analyst at the Open Society Foundations and Convener of The Justice Roundtable
Celebrities have a major impact on causes they embrace. I first witnessed this while working in the Free South Africa movement during the early 1980s, when tennis giant Arthur Ashe and legendary singer Harry Belafonte led a successful cultural boycott of South Africa. The campaign garnered international attention that helped catalyze the movement that ultimately led to Nelson Mandela’s release from prison and the dismantlement of apartheid. Later efforts by celebrities like pop-music icon Michael Jackson and the rock star Bono have helped transform issues like hunger, poverty, and HIV and AIDS into campaigns that have captured the public’s imagination and ignited change.
So when former model/actress Maria McDonald approached me at a forum on mandatory minimum sentences during last year’s Congressional Black Caucus Legislative Weekend, my ears perked up. I thought to myself, why would someone who has graced the covers and pages of Essence, Vogue and Bazaar, been in movies with Denzel Washington, and appeared on Miami Vice, One Life to Live, and Saturday Night Live be interested in mandatory minimum sentences? The answer came as no surprise.
Maria was recently stunned by the discovery that an old friend of hers, William Underwood, had been incarcerated for over 20 years on federal mandatory minimum drug conspiracy charges. She described him as an extraordinary person in the music industry, responsible for discovering, promoting, and managing the careers of several artists during the 1980s. When she discussed Underwood’s plight with her girlfriends in the fashion world, she found that many of them also had loved ones warehoused in prisons under excessively harsh mandatory minimum drug sentencing laws. Shortly after we met, Maria introduced me to William’s son, Anthony, who provided the inspiration and drive to get celebrities to challenge a common but under-acknowledged crisis occurring in their own backyard.
In less than a month, Anthony galvanized over 100 people connected to the music and entertainment industry who knew and loved his father before his incarceration, and requested that they lend their names to a new national campaign – Celebrities for Justice — initiated by a Washington-based policy coalition, the Justice Roundtable.
Internationally known superstar rapper/dancer M.C. Hammer (pictured) was one of the first to respond. “We are confident,” he stated, “that celebrity attention to cases such as Underwood’s will result in not only his release from a severe life sentence, but also the abolition of senseless sentencing schemes as a whole.”
Underwood has explained his involvement with drugs as one of the only opportunities that he and other young people had to earn money to relieve the crushing deprivation of their Harlem neighborhood. What originally became a way out of poverty unfortunately became a one-way ticket to prison.
In 1990, Underwood received a 20-year concurrent sentence on drug conspiracy charges, and life without parole on a continuing criminal enterprise count. Underwood was not charged or convicted of any offense involving violence, but the government alleged that he supervised a narcotics trafficking gang from 1971 to 1988 that involved heroin distribution and resulted in homicides. The life sentence was the result of a judicial finding by a mere preponderance of the evidence standard that he was a principal administrator, notwithstanding that the alleged conspiracy started when he was only18 years old, and despite a 1986 Federal Bureau of Investigation document stating, “(d)ue to the lack of current updated information concerning [his] alleged activities, this case is being closed at this time.” Underwood contends that during this time he was aggressively pursuing his career in the music industry, and was a frequent, visible presence at major music industry awards, galas, and functions. Tragically, because of major changes in sentencing policy over the years, if Underwood had been convicted in 1990 under the sentencing guidelines that exist today, there is a good chance he would now be a free man.
Challenging the details of criminal cases, however, is not the campaign’s central aim. “The focus of Celebrities for Justice is not guilt or innocence,” emphasized another campaign participant, R&B sensation Johnny Gill. “Our focus is for people like Underwood to return home to their families and serve as a positive influence on their lives and the community as a whole. We want to shine a light on the outrageous sentences they are serving that have no justifiable benefit to society.”
A case in point - Kemba Smith Pradia, the college girlfriend of a drug dealer, was sentenced to 24 years under drug conspiracy laws. As the result of the commutation of her sentence, she was able to return home after serving 6 years, resume the raising of her teen-aged son who was born while she was in prison, and touch countless lives as a motivational speaker. Her recently published memoir, Poster Child: The Kemba Smith Story, chronicles for people across the country the long-term consequences that poor choices can have on young lives.
Michelle West, who was in an abusive “girlfriend” scenario strikingly similar to Kemba’s, was petrified by threats to her mother and daughter and, as a result, rejected the FBI’s ultimatum to cooperate in the investigation of her boyfriend. She is currently serving two life sentences plus 50 years without parole on charges of drug conspiracy and aiding and abetting a drug-related homicide. Hamedah Hasan was pregnant with her youngest daughter when she began serving a 27-year sentence in 1993 on a crack cocaine conspiracy offense. Absent intervention, her daughter will be nearly 30 years old before she is released. These stories merely scratch the surface of the adverse impact of long, counterproductive drug sentencing laws on human lives.
Regardless of whether they devastate the lives of music industry personalities like Underwood or young mothers such as Smith, West and Hasan, college students like Lawrence and Lamont Garrison, or major league baseball players like Willie Mays Aikens, the excessive mandatory sentences that continue to imprison tens of thousands of Americans must be re-examined. Lengthy incarceration has failed to abate or reduce drug trafficking, and has not improved the quality of life in deteriorating neighborhoods. It has, however, destructively removed vast numbers of people, particularly African American men and women, from their families and communities, sometimes for decades, sometimes for life.
Celebrities for Justice will highlight the problems of mandatory sentencing policies and complement the growing movement against mass incarceration in the United States — what some call the “new Jim Crow” — by leveraging the eminence of celebrities with the advocacy of civil rights leaders, criminal justice and drug policy groups, student organizations, religious and faith groups, families, and the formerly incarcerated.
Just as yesterday’s celebrity advocates were influential in the international arena to free Nelson Mandela and demand the end of apartheid, celebrities today must use their influence to champion justice here at home. In his appeal to celebrities, Anthony Underwood, echoing the thoughts of thousands of people with loved ones languishing in prison under harsh sentencing laws, simply stated, “It’s been nearly 25 years; it’s time to bring my dad home.”

That's really a great and
That's really a great and informative post. Keep up the good work.
were are you in 2012
sounds to good to be ture, we are in 2012 and nothing has changed. funny how people with big name get behind something when it is free press! then exit stage left when the lights go off. well I am still standing even if I am stand alone. Did you ever ask your self when you see made in the USA ? made in prison !
Mandatory Minimum Sentences is a JIM CROW LAW 18-to1 is still JIM CROW
Made in the USA= Made in prison=Modren Day Slavery!
Life w/o Parole
There are thousands of federal inmates serving life without parole, almost half of them are first time and/or nonviolent offenders. One of these inmates serving life is named Jason Hernandez, a non-violent drug offender who at the age of 21 was sentenced to life without parole, despite having no prior adult conviction, simply because his crime involved crack cocaine as opposed to powder cocaine: Two drug drugs which science now demonstrates the chemical difference between the two, is like the difference between water and ice or beer and wine
At Jason's sentencing the United States District Judge stated he did not agree with Congress' decision to punish crack cocaine offenders so severely, but that under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines he had no discretion to impose a sentence less than life without parole. Recently the federal sentencing system that mandated Jason be sentenced to life without parole was eventually ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States, but that Jason was not entitled to be re-sentenced simply because he was sentenced before the Supreme Court ruling.
The narcotic's officer that was responsible for Jason's prosecution has stated Jason does not deserve to be in prison for the rest of his life and that he is willing to do what he can to obtain Jason's release.
That despite the very real likelihood of Jason dying in prison, he is a model inmate: He has never received an incident report, has completed numerous college courses, has mentored troubled youth from the community and is apart of a program that oversees inmates that are suicidal. Despite his young age during the time of his arrest, despite that he was a first time offender, despite it was a nonviolent crime, Jason will die in federal prison unless the laws change for those in his situation!!!
Life w/o Parole
There are thousands of federal inmates serving life without parole, almost half of them are first time and/or nonviolent offenders. One of these inmates serving life is named Jason Hernandez, a non-violent drug offender who at the age of 21 was sentenced to life without parole, despite having no prior adult conviction, simply because his crime involved crack cocaine as opposed to powder cocaine: Two drug drugs which science now demonstrates the chemical difference between the two, is like the difference between water and ice or beer and wine
At Jason's sentencing the United States District Judge stated he did not agree with Congress' decision to punish crack cocaine offenders so severely, but that under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines he had no discretion to impose a sentence less than life without parole. Recently the federal sentencing system that mandated Jason be sentenced to life without parole was eventually ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States, but that Jason was not entitled to be resentenced simply because he was sentenced before the Supreme Court ruling.
The narcotic's officer that was responsible for Jason's prosecution has stated Jason does not deserve to be in prison for the rest of his life and that he is willing to do what he can to obtain Jason's release.
That despite the very real likelihood of Jason dying in prison, he is a model inmate: He has never received an incident report, has completed numerous college courses, has mentored troubled youth from the community and is apart of a program that oversees inmates that are suicidal. Despite his young age during the time of his arrest, despite that he was a first time offender, despite it was a nonviolent crime, Jason will die in federal prison unless the laws change for those in his situation!!!
Stand up for change!!
I think what your doing is great and needs to be applauded.. My boyfriend was a talented artist with a big heart and a gift from God to be a rapper. His dream was cut short in 2009 at 26 years old when he was convicted in federal court on drug conspiracy charges and handed a 20 year sentence.
In 2008 he released a album here locally which made its way all the way to the billboard charts and he has done so many good deeds to give back to the community. And even though he wasn't in the top 25, or top 50 for that matter, he was okay with that and knew he had found his calling and was prepared to do what needed to be done to leave the street life behind and give his family, especially his children a chance of making it in life. We are from Kansas City, Mo. and around here you rarely hear of people pulling together to raise the issue about the mandatory minimum sentences that are being handed out like free lunch passes. I believe that its something more that needs to be done to make the judicial system fair and to stop caging our people away like animals. It is truly many very good men and women rotting away in the federal prison system that just truly should not be. I pray that this type of cruelty will soon be corrected and our love ones are returned back home. This is a good way to send a wake up call to the many of people of power that standby and let the unjust punishment called the law continue on.
rescue the oversentenced
Well written piece. Drug dealers have nothing on those prosecutors that go after the low hanging fruit without slowing down the drug trade; the severity of punishment imposed through MM sentencing is an even greater crime, with more hugely devastating effects on the community. We could address the drug problem in vastly more constructive ways. Can we dare to hope that we can change the system?
Minimum Mandatory Sentences
Wish to comment about the lack of scientific challenges to minimum Mandatory Sentences. In my chemist consulting cases, locally and nationally substantial errors have been encountered by both law enforcement and laboratories in processing cases - to the extent that uncovered facts revealed that findings fell far under minimal sentencing limits. This existing condition further corroborates your position of really doing something about the social costs to both the public and the defendants.
Post new comment