Sen. Arlen Specter

  • December 22, 2010

    Sen. Arlen Specter took the opportunity of his farewell address to lambast not only the "ideological cannibalism" of his fellow politicians, but also the judicial activism of the Supreme Court, calling on Congress to "stop the Supreme Court from further eroding their constitutional mandate of separation of powers."

    "The Supreme Court has been eating Congress' lunch by invalidating legislation with judicial activism after nominees commit under oath in confirmation proceedings to respect congressional fact-finding and precedent, that is, stare decisis," Specter said, citing Citizens United as an example.

    "Chief justice Roberts promised to just call balls and strikes, and then he moved the bases," Specter added.

    Specter acknowledged that Congress must recognize the importance of judicial independence, but suggested Congress "at least" require televised court proceedings " to provide some transparency to inform the public about what the court is doing, since it has the final word on cutting issues of the day."

    Watch Specter's statement below.

     

  • January 12, 2010

    Sen. Arlen Specter previously indicated that he was opposed to President Barack Obama's nomination of Dawn Johnsen to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). MainJustice's Andrew Ramonas just reported that Specter has had a change of heart.

    "After voting ‘pass' [which means no position] in the Judiciary Committee, I had a second extensive meeting with Ms. Johnsen and have been prepared to support her nomination when it reaches the Senate floor," Specter said in statement. 

    The nomination of Johnsen, a former ACS board member, now appears to have the support of 60 senators, including Republican Sen. Richard Lugar, (potentially dependent upon the results of next week's special election in Massachusettes.) Specter's new position was made public following an attack by his primary challenger, Rep. Joe Sestak, in which Sestak faulted Specter for Johnsen's nomination remaining in limbo.

  • November 6, 2009

    Camera-shy Justice David Souter is retired; Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justice John Paul Stevens interviewed with ABC's "Primetime;" Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas appeared on CBS's "60 Minutes;" Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg showed up CBS News; Justice Stephen Breyer braved "Fox News Sunday;" every single justice spoke with C-SPAN for their recent documentary on the high court. So why aren't oral arguments before the Supreme Court televised or livestreamed?

    This is the question that Sen. Arlen Specter posed yesterday, and not for the first time. Specter, a long-time advocate of televising Supreme Court sessions, again argued that the benefits of transparency at the Court outweigh the costs to the justices. Specter also applauded the recently formed Supreme Court of the United Kingdom for welcoming cameras into its proceedings. 

    Specter used his recent speech to introduce a non-binding resolution on cameras in the Court, to determine "the sense of the Senate." "He so far has seven co-sponsors, including Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who is the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a former state Supreme Court justice," The National Law Journal reports. "No vote on the resolution has been scheduled."