Public Defenders

  • April 13, 2010
    Guest Post

    By David Carroll, Director of Research, National Legal Aid & Defender Association

    The Star Tribune reports that line public defenders in 11 Minnesota counties have filed a labor grievance over excessive workload. The grievance sites a February 2010 Legislative Auditor's report that states that the average Minnesota public defender caseload in 2009 was 779 cases, or nearly twice the national caseload standard for misdemeanor cases only. The National Advisory Commission (NAC) on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals first developed numerical caseload limits in 1973 under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Justice that state a public defender attorney should not exceed more than 400 misdemeanor cases in a single year if that is the only type of case she handles. The American Bar Association's Ten Principles instruct that caseloads should "under no circumstances exceed" these numerical limits.

    One problem cited in the Legislative Auditor's report is that excessive caseloads are limiting supervisors' abilities to properly monitor and coach assistant public defenders as supervisors themselves are carrying too many cases. Forty-three percent of public defenders surveyed by the Auditor's Office responded that "their supervisors in the past year had not reviewed any of their cases in the context of assessing performance." The actions of the line attorneys filing a grievance reflect the recommendations of the ABA Ethics Opinion that states, "[i]f the supervisor fails to provide appropriate assistance or relief, the lawyer should continue to advance up the chain of command" until relief is addressed.

    Structurally, Minnesota is one of a handful of states that more readily meets Gideon's promise. A statewide, independent Board of Public Defense oversees representation of accused people of insufficient means in each of Minnesota's 87 counties.

  • February 22, 2010
    Guest Post

    By Virginia Sloan, President and Founder, The Constitution Project; & Cait Clarke, Director of Public Interest Law Opportunities, Equal Justice Works

    Across the country, public defender offices are underfunded and understaffed, drowning in overwhelming caseloads. Public defenders are dedicated lawyers trying their best to represent their clients in often-impossible circumstances. Even worse, in many areas around the country, there are no public defender systems at all, resulting in a haphazard system of appointing lawyers who may be unprepared, without sufficient resources, and have no relevant experience.

    It has been nearly 50 years since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright decreeing that there is a constitutional right to a lawyer in criminal cases and that the government must provide one if the defendant cannot afford one. The Court recognized that well-trained and adequately resourced defense lawyers are the best way to determine whether the right person has been arrested for a crime. Yet states and localities are not providing the funds to pay for these lawyers, meaning that poor people are languishing in jail at the taxpayers' expense with no real opportunity to mount a defense.

    While funding for indigent defense has increased since Gideon was decided, funding is woefully inadequate and the current economic crisis confronting many state and local governments is exacerbating the situation tremendously.

    The U.S. Department of Justice has just hosted a National Symposium on Indigent Defense, the first of its kind in 10 years. One of the goals of the Symposium was to look at America's indigent defense systems in each state from top to bottom, and to examine both successful and failed attempts at indigent defense reform. Attendees committed to working together to craft new ideas for successful reforms, while forging alliances and building partnerships to achieve them. We applaud the Department of Justice's leadership in hosting this Symposium. It is a much-needed effort to spotlight the failings of the nation's criminal justice system and the crises persisting in state public defense programs.

    However, the Symposium is, in our view, only the beginning of the work that must be done to fulfill the promise of Gideon.

  • December 1, 2009

    Public defender offices handled 352 cases per attorney in 2007, according to a new report released by the Justice Department. The caseloads are unlikely to decrease amid state budget shortfalls.

    Legal blogger Matt Kelley writes:

    Staffing cuts -- and therefore, caseload spikes -- have been hitting [public defender] offices hard during this difficult year for state budgets. Support staff is sometimes the first to go when budgets get tight, and the loss of these critical team members can be devastating for the quality of representation. The [Justice Department] study found that the 17,000 attorneys in 2007 were aided by 11,000 support staff - from secretaries to file clerks to investigators and paralegals. Prosecutors have investigators on their side -- they're called police -- so when public defenders lose their investigators, the scales become even more unbalanced.

    This weekend, a Kentucky county learned that it must cut 30 percent of its budget for next year and an Indiana county announced that it was cutting several attorney and support staff positions. Prosecutors' offices are feeling the pinch, too, and a Michigan DA is thinking about suing his own county over deep cuts on the table.

  • June 26, 2009
    President Obama has nominated a former public defender and a federal public defender to be U.S. District Court judges. Charlene Honeywell served two years as an assistant public defender in the Tampa Public Defender's Office and Jeffrey Viken is the Federal Public Defender for North and South Dakota. More information on the nominees is here.