By Jeremiah Frei-Pearson, a member of the ACS New York Lawyer Chapter Executive Committee, and a civil rights attorney who ran for the New York State Assembly in 2010
Remember the 2000 election? Although over 500,000 more Americans voted for Al Gore than George W. Bush, Bush received 5 more electoral votes than Gore and, as a result, won the presidency. An unnecessary and unending war, economic collapse and a rising poverty rate ensued. This sort of scenario could be avoided in the future if our state legislatures could collectively pass the National Popular Vote.
The debacles of 2000-2008 can't be blamed solely on the Electoral College, but, the fact re
mains that if the candidate who got the most votes were awarded with the presidency, Al Gore would have been America's 43rd president. (Problems with the Electoral College can favor Republicans as well. In 2004, George W. Bush got over 3 million more votes than John Kerry, but Kerry came within less than 130,000 votes in Ohio from winning the presidency.) Unfortunately, our country relies on the Electoral College, an atavistic system that was created at a time when women and minorities couldn't vote and long before the Supreme Court enshrined "one person one vote" into law.
In a worst case scenario like 2000, the Electoral College damages our democracy by thwarting the clearly expressed will of most American voters. But, even when the Electoral College does not directly decide the outcome of presidential elections, it harms our democracy. Currently, presidential campaigns are designed to get 270 electoral votes. Both major parties tend to write-off certain "safe" states like New York (safely Democratic in recent elections) or Texas (safely Republican in recent elections) and concentrate all their resources in "swing states" like Ohio and Florida. This means that a majority of Americans are virtually ignored by our candidates (except for constant requests for money), while those who live in swing-states receive a disproportionate amount of attention.

ACSblog
This fall, at American University (AU) in Washington, D.C., ACS Executive Director Caroline Fredrickson moderated a debate about whether to replace the electoral college with a national popular vote in presidential elections. Critiquing the national popular vote plan were John Samples, Director of the CATO Institute's Center for Representative Government, and Alexander Belenky, author of How America Chooses Its Presidents. Debating on behalf of a national popular vote were John Koza, Chairman of National Popular Vote Inc., and Jamie Raskin, a Maryland State Senator and Director of the Law & Government Program at AU's Washington College of Law, who previously outlined his positions on the electoral college for ACSblog