LGBT

  • September 30, 2011

    by Jeremy Leaming

    The NFL, as noted earlier this week by The Huffington Post’s Amanda Terkel, included in its current collective bargaining agreement a clause prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation.

    The provision states, in part, “There will be no discrimination in any form against any player by the Management Council, any Club or by the NFLPA [NFL Players Association] because of race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, or activity or lack of activity on behalf of the NFLPA.”

    Terkel notes that there “are no openly gay professional sports players in football, basketball, baseball or hockey,” and that the NFL “has received some criticism” for not participating in a national effort to help LGBT youth who suffer from bullying because of their sexual orientation.

    She did note that some NFL players, such as the Baltimore Ravens’ Brendon Ayanbadejo, have spoken in support of LGBT equality.

    In an article for The Huffington Post, Ayanbadejo defended marriage quality. First he noted the lameness of the religious-based argument against marriage equality primarily that a divinity does not approve of same-sex marriages. “First and foremost,” Ayanbadejo wrote, “church and state are supposed to be completely separated when it comes to the rule of law in the Unites States. So the religious argument that God meant for only one man and woman to be together has no bearing here!”

    He concluded, “Maybe I am a man ahead of my time. However, looking at the former restrictions on human rights in our country starting with slavery, women not being able to vote, blacks being counted as two thirds of a human, segregation, no gays in the military (to list a few) all have gone by the wayside. But now here in 2009 same sex marriages are prohibited. I think we will look back in 10, 20, 30 years and be amazed that gays and lesbians did not have the same rights as everyone else.”  

    Maybe the only thing surprising about the NFL’s support of a measure prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation is that it took so long for the league to adopt it. This is the professional sports league that in 2002 adopted the Rooney Rule, which requires NFL teams to interview diverse candidates, including at least one African American, for head coaching positions.

    In an ACS Issue Brief, Douglas C. Proxmire, a partner at Patton Boggs LLP, noted the positive impact the Rooney Rule has had on diversifying the NFL’s coaching ranks. But Proxmire also wrote that the Rule should be expanded to additional NFL positions, and that other professional sports leagues should also adopt similar policies.

  • March 26, 2010
    Guest Post

    By Lawrence J. Korb, Sean E. Duggan & Laura Conley, Center for American Progress

    Yesterday Defense Secretary Robert Gates eased the enforcement of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) policy that bans gay men and lesbians from serving openly in the U.S. military. Gates raised the level of an officer permitted to initiate discharge proceedings and reconfigured the Defense Department's standards for credible information and reliable persons in DADT investigations, among other important changes. These are welcome adjustments that will make it harder to discharge service members under this unfair, outdated policy.

    But easing enforcement of the ban is not enough. DOD's next task, as outlined by Gates in his testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this year, is to determine how to prepare for the complete repeal of DADT.

    The Secretary has charged a DOD working group with examining this issue and asked it to complete an implementation plan by the end of 2010. While Gates should be commended for keeping the group's focus on how, rather than whether to repeal the policy, delaying implementation until the study is complete is unnecessary. As the experiences of some of our country's closest allies, as well as a careful review of DOD's regulations demonstrate, a policy of open service can be implemented simply and quickly, without detriment to unit cohesion or military effectiveness.

    In 1992, the Canadian Forces agreed to settle a case with a former service member who was discharged based on her sexual orientation. The military announced the same day that it would remove all limitations on homosexuals. Researchers at the Palm Center at the University of California-Santa Barbara noted in 2000 that "after the ban was lifted ... follow-up studies found no increase in disciplinary, performance, recruitment, sexual misconduct, or resignation problems."

  • November 4, 2009

    While Democrats swept congressional races yesterday (CA-10 and NY-23) and Republicans monopolized gubernatorial elections (New Jersey and Virginia,) the march towards LGBT equality may be the most notable storyline of Election Day, 2009.

    In the most-watched race concerning LGBT rights, Maine voters repealed marriage equality legislation 53 percent to 47 percent. Equality advocates had hoped that Maine's libertarian streak -- which powered a medical marijuana initiative's passage 60 percent to 40 percent -- would contribute to their success as well. In the end, however, Maine became the 31st state in which voters rejected marriage equality.

    On the northern tip of the other coast, Washington State voters appear to have endorsed legislation granting domestic partnership rights to same-sex couples. Referendum 71 was placed on the ballot by opponents of Washington's "everything but marriage" law, passed earlier this year in Olympia. "Sources differ as to whether the race has officially been called or not, but it appears that Referendum 71, which expands domestic partner rights to an everything-except-marriage standard in Washington, will be Approved," writes Nate Silver. "The initiative leads by only about 22,000 votes right now, but about a third of the outstanding vote is from Seattle's King County, which supports it heavily."