Islamic center

  • August 26, 2010
    A Florida pastor has found a way to garner attention - lots of it - for his otherwise unremarkable, but financially troubled evangelical church. The pastor of the fittingly named Dove World Outreach Center has planned a burning of Qurans to mark the forthcoming 9/11 anniversary. Pastor Terry Jones has dubbed the event "International Burn a Koran Day," and conceded to The New York Times that he doesn't know much about the religious text, and that the planned event is drawing donations at a time when his bank has demanded payment on the church's mortgage and its property insurance has been cancelled.

    Although, Jones says he has "no experience with it [the Quran]," and only knows "the Bible," he is nonetheless convinced that Islam is "full of lies," and a religion "of the devil." The pastor's actions have drawn attention worldwide. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) calls the planned burning an outrage. Watch video of some of CAIR's response here. Dr. Saeed Khan, a professor at the University of Florida, told The Times that Jones is "hijacking Christianity," much like "Al Qaeda hijacked Islam."

    As noted here, First Amendment scholar Charles C. Haynes has maintained that the rise of anti-Islam rhetoric is not only a danger to religious liberty in the country but also plays into the hands of extremists. "Such ill-informed statements must be music to al-Qaida's ears. After all, al-Qaida has worked hard to convince the Muslim world that its political and violent ideology is the true face of Islam - and America's ‘war on terrorism' is actually a ‘war on Islam,' Haynes wrote.

  • August 25, 2010
    Guest Post

    By Donna Lieberman, Executive Director, New York Civil Liberties Union, and Louise Melling, Deputy Legal Director, ACLU.

    Cross-posted at ACLU's Blog of Rights

    "Of course you have the right to build a mosque, but it is insensitive to build it there."

    This is the newest version of the call from critics of the proposed Islamic center in downtown New York City. The sentiment may at first blush seem sensitive: it recognizes the trauma of 9/11, the sacred nature of Ground Zero and the constitutional right to religious freedom. But the sentiment that the Islamic center can be built - just elsewhere - inevitably reflects a prejudice and intolerance that is in fact inconsistent with religious freedom.

    To conclude that building the Islamic center near Ground Zero is insensitive, one must, consciously or not, believe that the Muslims of downtown New York City who will come to the center to pray are - by virtue of their faith - all tainted by the terrorists who committed an atrocious act in the name of Islam. How else to explain the alleged "insensitivity"?

    Political leaders like Mayor Bloomberg in New York should be praised for standing up for religious freedom in the face of political pressure. But the voices of prejudice still fill the airwaves, and outright hostility toward mosques continues to flare up around the country in locations having no relation to any acts of terrorism.

  • August 24, 2010
    Guest Post

    By Sahar Aziz. Ms. Aziz is the author of Sticks and Stones, Words That Hurt: Entrenched Stereotypes Eight Years After 9/11 published in the New York City Law Review. She is a Legal Fellow at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding and serves as counsel to the Bill of Rights Defense Committee.

    The political backlash and opportunism surrounding President Obama's defense of Muslims' First Amendment rights jeopardizes religious freedom for all Americans.

    On August 13, 2010, the White House sponsored the annual Iftar, a tradition started by President Clinton in 1996, commemorating the month of Ramadan. Diplomats, members of Congress, and community leaders from diverse backgrounds celebrated America's venerable support for religious diversity and freedom.

    At the dinner President Obama accurately summarized the Founders' intent to preserve religious freedom in America, for native-born and immigrant alike. He commendably stated, "As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan."

    Republicans were quick to criticize President Obama for "endorsing" of what has misleadingly come to be known as the "Ground Zero Mosque." Facing a tough reelection, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid broke with Obama, joining those who call for the mosque to be built somewhere else. Leading critics claim that they aren't opposed to building the community center and mosque per se, but rather its location. But their claim is belied by growing protests against mosques in cities across the country, not to mention escalating religious bigotry on the internet and a scheduled Koran burning on September 11. Statements from major figures like Newt Gingrich comparing supporters of the community center to Nazis make it clear that, in fact, all Muslims are being falsely tarred with the brush of extremism.

  • August 23, 2010
    As noted by First Amendment scholar Charles C. Haynes, anti-mosque rhetoric is not unique to the situation unfolding around the construction of the Islamic center in New York City. The Washington Post reports on strife surrounding plans for construction of an Islamic center in Murfreesboro, Tenn., not far outside Nashville. Local officials, The Post notes, approved the project in the spring, but the affair has been turbulent. The newspaper also cites similar controversies developing in California and Florida as well as a recent Time poll showing that "43 percent of Americans hold unfavorable views of Muslims, far outpacing" unfavorable views of other religious groups.

    The planned construction of an Islamic worship center in Murfreesboro, which The Post describes as "a quiet town of 100,000 people, largely white conservative Christians," drew especially heated opposition. Jim Daniel, a former county commissioner, told the newspaper, "What I sense is a certain amount of fear fueling the animosity," and that residents worry "the Muslims coming in here will keep growing in numbers and override our system of law and impose sharia law." TV preacher Pat Robertson helped stoke the sentiment on his "700 Club," broadcast asserting that it was "entirely possible," for Muslims to bribe Murfreesboro officials to help push the project forward.

    Akbar Ahmed, head of Islamic studies at American University, told The Post, "We are becoming aware that the gap between Muslims and non-Muslims is wider than it was after 9/11, and that's a frightening prospect."

    In a recent column for FindLaw, constitutional law expert Marci Hamilton wrote that furor over the construction of the Islamic center in NYC revealed a troubling threat to a core American value - religious liberty. "The United States has established the most remarkable principle in the history of cultures - an absolute right to believe whatever you want," she wrote.

  • August 19, 2010
    While conservative pundits, such as Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, are loudly fighting the planned Islamic center and mosque in New York City, legal scholars and First Amendment experts are noting the hypocrisy of the attacks on the planned religious site, the harm the attacks have on democracy, and the fact that the law appears to be squarely on the side of permitting the project to go forward.

    As noted here yesterday, the First Amendment scholar Charles C. Haynes has said that the rising "anti-mosque rhetoric," is reminiscent of other periods in the country when disfavored religious groups were the victims of intolerance - Haynes notes, for instance, anti-Catholicism that festered throughout the nation during the 19th Century.

    In a recent column for The Washington Post website's "On Faith," Haynes writes:

    Since 9/11, demonization of Islam has become a cottage industry in America, aided and abetted by some evangelical leaders and a growing number of politicians. Much like the anti-Catholic hysteria of the 19th century, the current outbreak of Islamophobia is based on the paranoid fantasy that Islam in America is a threat to democracy and freedom.

    Haynes, the First Amendment Center's senior scholar and director of the Newseum's Religious Freedom Education Project, adds that what is truly at stake is the nation's commitment to religious freedom, for all:

    It's time for people of conscience to look beyond what's happening in Manhattan and pay closer attention to the growing anti-mosque movement around the nation. Although extreme voices now dominate the debate in many local communities, I am hopeful that most Americans will have the courage to stand up for their Muslim neighbors and fellow citizens by speaking out for religious freedom.

    Constitutional law expert Marci A. Hamilton, in an article for FindLaw, maintains that "crude politics has polluted the American values that must be vindicated."

    Hamilton, a law professor at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, writes:

    Sadly, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) have each made an exception to their usual full-throated defense of religious interests, and publicly come out against the mosque proposal. The ACLJ joined the conservative commentators, like Sarah Palin, who have tried to transform this land- use application into a way of energizing the base over terrorism. Yet, the only apparent connection between the application and 9/11 is their co-residence in the wide universe of Islamicism. It's like saying that Jim Jones's Peoples Temple Christian Church Full Gospel, which resulted in the largest mass suicide in history, was Christian. The two groups have thus turned this into an instance of identity politics, rather than any kind of sincere honoring of America's war dead.