Federal Courts

  • October 24, 2011

    by Nicole Flatow

    Republican candidates are making the courts a campaign issue, launching “biting and sustained attacks on the federal courts and the role they play in American life,” The New York Times reports in a front-page story today.

    "Any one of those proposals would significantly undercut the independence and authority of federal judges,” echoes a second article from The Associated Press.

    Proposals from candidates include eliminating those courts that politicians deem “radical,” barring courts from deciding cases on same-sex marriage, and bringing judges before Congress to explain their decisions, under threat of impeachment.

     “These threats go far beyond normal campaign season posturing,” Justice at Stake Executive Director Bert Brandenburg told The Times. “They sound populist, but the proposal is to make courts answer to politicians and interest groups.”

    What’s more, several of these proposals run counter to our constitutional system, such as imposing term limits on federal judges, and enabling Congress to overturn Supreme Court decisions by a two-thirds vote.

    "Debates like these could threaten to lead to a new cycle of attempts to politicize the courts,” Brandenburg tells The Associated Press.

  • November 30, 2010
    Court-watchers have noted the lack of diversity on the federal bench, and a new graph produced by the federal government confirms that gender diversity is seriously lagging.

    According to the graph from the United States Courts' website, which is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the federal judiciary, since 1998 the number of female judges has risen, but is still significantly lower than male judges. The number of women judges, since 1998, has increased to 496 from 302. In 2009 male judges exceeded 1,500.

    Glenn Sugameli, founder and head of the environmental community's Judging the Environment project and website on federal judicial nominations, told ACSblog, "The U.S. Courts' Federal Bench Gender Snapshot shows a disappointing lack of major progress in the percentage of female federal judges in recent years."

    Sugameli continued, "President Obama's 43 confirmed judicial nominees include 22 women and 17 men and women of color. Senate Republican obstruction of every pending judicial nominee, however, is blocking votes that would increase the diversity of the federal bench. Ten of the 23 nominees awaiting Floor votes are women and 13 are men and women of color."

    In an interview with ACSblog, Maryland law school professor Sherrilyn Ifill talks about the need to diversify the federal bench, noting that the decision-making process would be enhanced by judges "who represent and are reflective of the larger society." Ifill's interview followed an ACS panel discussion focusing on diversity on the federal bench.

  • December 31, 2009
    The Senate recently confirmed "roughly three dozen" of the Obama administration's nominees, but left dozens more languishing, The Washington Post reported. Regarding nominations to the federal bench, The Post noted that the Senate has confirmed "just 13 judges, including Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor." The newspaper continued, "Nineteen judicial nominations are pending in the Senate with four referred to lawmakers last week."

    In a Dec. 23 press statement, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy blasted conservatives for slowing the nomination process. Leahy said:

    I have been calling on the Republican leadership to end the delays and obstruction of judicial nominations and join with us to make progress in filling some of the many vacancies on Federal circuit and district courts. I have done so repeatedly for most of the year, and several times over this last month. Regrettably, as we head into the winter recess and the end of the first session of the 111th Congress, Republican obstruction is setting a new low for the Senate in our consideration of judicial nominations.

    The Posted noted, however, that despite opposition on "some judicial picks, the Obama administration has nominated far fewer judges in its first year than did the administrations of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton."

    The San Francisco Chronicle reported on the embattled nominations of Magistrate Judge Edward Chen (right) for a federal judgeship in California and Dawn Johnsen to head the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). The Chronicle stated that both nominations were sent back to the administration for reconsideration. 

    Sen. Diane Feinstein told the Chronicle that she hoped the administration would renominate Chen, saying he has a "pristine record" as a magistrate judge.

    Opposition to Johnsen, an Indiana University law school professor and former member of the ACS Board of Directors, has been especially protracted, and, in part, has targeted her critique of the OLC during the Bush administration. Attorney General Eric Holder, on numerous occasions, has expressed strong support for Johnsen's nomination.

  • November 13, 2009
    Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. announced this morning that the Department of Justice will prosecute some suspected terrorists, held at the Guantánamo Bay military prison, in federal court.

    Holder said at a press briefing that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other men, "accused of conspiring to commit the 9/11 attacks" will be prosecuted in federal court. Holder said that Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri and four other military detainees charged with the 2000 "terrorist attack on the USS Cole," will be prosecuted before a military commission.

    "I am confident in the ability of our courts to provide these defendants a fair trial, just as they have for over 200 years," Holder said. "The alleged 9/11 conspirators will stand trial in our justice system before an impartial jury under long-established rules and procedures."

    Holder continued, "I want to assure the American people that we will prosecute these cases vigorously, and we will pursue the maximum punishment available. These were extraordinary crimes and so we will seek maximum penalties. Federal rules allow us to seek the death penalty for capital offenses, and while we will review the evidence and circumstances following established protocols, I fully expect to direct prosecutors to seek the death penalty against each of the alleged 9/11 conspirators."

    Holder's announcement drew mostly favorable comment from civil liberties groups that have opposed the use of military commissions.

    Human Rights First hailed the "decision to move the trials of the 5 Guantanamo detainees accused in the 9/11 conspiracy from the discredited Guantanamo military commissions and into federal courts to face justice."

    The American Civil Liberties Union called the action a "major victory for due process and the rule of law," but also criticized the administration for continuing "to use the illegitimate military commissions system to prosecute some Guantánamo detainees, including the defendant accused in the attack on the U.S.S. Cole."

  • November 3, 2009
    Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates are opposing a bill that would block the Justice Department from prosecuting detainees at the Guantanamo Bay military prison in U.S. courts, reports The Associated Press. The news service says the administration officials stated in an Oct. 30 letter that they want the option of prosecuting detainees in military or civilian courts. Sens. Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Joe Lieberman are pushing the legislative measure that would bar the Justice Department from spending funds on prosecuting detainees in U.S. Courts.

    ABC News correspondent Jake Tapper also reports on his Political Punch blog that the administration will announce within the next couple of weeks "the names of detainees in Guantanamo Bay whom federal prosecutors plan on trying in U.S. civilian courts and which ones they will send to a military commission." In a recent guest post for ACSblog, Eric Montalvo, senior litigation counsel at Tully Rinckey PLLC in Washington, D.C. and a former Marine Corps Judge Advocate (JAG), examines the use of military commissions, saying that they "do not present defendants with a meaningful opportunity to challenge the bases of the detention."