Employment Non-Discrimination Act

  • May 21, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    As noted here recently, marriage equality, as important as it is for many lesbians and gay men, can hardly be seen as the key to full equality for the LGBT community in America. But what has not been noted on this blog, or overlooked by it, has been placed in perspective at Jacobin’s blog by Kate Redburn.

    In a post earlier this month Redburn lamented the fact that the marriage equality movement “is designed to distract liberal consciences and give Democrats political cover to gut social services.” She notes that Mayor Michael Bloomberg lauded President Barack Obama’s embrace of marriage equality days after pushing a budget that contained whopping slashes in funding for homeless shelters for the youth, “in a city where 40% of homeless youth are LGBT.”

    Many other states are also cutting services to their most vulnerable, at a time when the nation’s middle class is shrinking and its number of poor is swelling. And the topic of the nation’s gaping wealth gap is not one that is particularly enjoyable for many to engage.

    The nation’s right wing is hostile to the discussion and tars most who point to the disheartening and destructive nature the growing concentration of wealth as rants from crazed collectivists. Even the allegedly upbeat and inclusive conferencing group dubbed TED, devoted to providing “riveting talks by remarkable people, free to the world,” couldn’t handle a talk that hit upon economic inequality. As Alex Pareene reports for Salon, TED head Chris Anderson in an e-mail exchange with Nick Hanauer, author of a forthcoming book on the wealth gap, explained, in part, why Hanauer’s “TED talk,” would not be one of the talks featured on the TED website. Part of the reason centered on comments Hanauer made during his talk that could insult entrepreneurs. Read Pareene’s article for more about what exactly a TED talk is, but one of Pareene’s most enjoyable observations is, “At this point TED is a massive, money-soaked orgy of self-congratulatory futurism ….”

    In addition to the nation’s increasing tattered safety net, laws protecting the LGBT community from all kinds of discrimination are too few or limited.  

  • May 10, 2012
    Guest Post

    By Lisa Mottet, Transgender Civil Rights Project Director for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force


    Though garnering less attention than North Carolina's disheartening constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and President Obama's monumental announcement to support same-sex marriage, another recent piece of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) news deserves significant attention.

    In what is accurately hailed as a game-changing decision for the LGBT community, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled in April (Macy v. Holder) that transgender people are protected by Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination in the workplace.

    The precedential decision involved Mia Macy, a transgender woman represented by Transgender Law Center who was all but officially hired by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) when, after she told them she is transgender, she was told the position had been cut due to funding. ATF actually hired someone else and Mia lost her home as a result of the lost job opportunity.

    When ATF discriminated against Mia she became part of the horrifying statistics on employment discrimination faced by transgender people. According to the National Transgender Discrimination Survey: 26 percent lost a job for being transgender; 50 percent were harassed at work; and many others face humiliation, have their privacy breached, and are denied access to appropriate restrooms. Overall, 78 percent have experienced mistreatment, harassment, or discrimination on the job.

  • April 1, 2011

    Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are trying yet again to advance a measure to prohibit employers from discriminating against workers because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

    Rep. Barney Frank announced introduction of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) earlier this week. The measure, The Rainbow Times reports, has received wide public support, and President Obama has also said he would sign such a bill.

    Lambda Legal Executive Director Kevin Cathcart lauded the renewed effort, saying, “It is long past time to address this inequality and pass a law that provides fairness for workers without regard to sexual orientation or gender identity.”

    Rea Carey, head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said, “ENDA’s passage is long overdue. Our community has provided numbers and personal stories, and we have endured as we’ve watched LGBT workers lose their foothold in a struggling economy – not because of downsizing, or poor performance or shuttered businesses – but because of prejudice and because there are no institutional consequences to arbitrary and unethical behavior by individuals and businesses who would exclude LGBT people from the basic tenets of our democracy.”

    University of North Carolina law school professor Maxine Eichner wrote in an ACS Issue Brief that 29 states, including the entire South, “afford no employment discrimination for gays and lesbians,” and that the 21 state laws aimed at preventing discrimination “are significantly limited in scope.”

    Eichner cited a CareerBuilder.com study showing that 28 percent of LGBT workers reported facing workplace discrimination. “In one reported case,” she wrote, “a gay maintenance worker had his hands and feet bound by his co-workers. In another, a transgender corrections officer was smashed into a concrete wall. Further accounts of LGBT workers who are subjected to harassing comments and unequal working conditions once their status was discovered abound.”

     

  • September 6, 2010
    For some Americans, Labor Day is a fleeting break to take stock of personal or professional advancements and to mark the dwindling days of summer. But for lesbian, gay men, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) workers it can too often serve as a reminder that equality in the workforce has yet to be achieved, as Professor Maxine Eichner notes in a new ACS Issue Brief.

    Eichner, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law, notes that Congress has taken steps to protect workers from discrimination, such as passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which "prohibited discrimination on a number of bases: race, religion, color, national origin and sex," as well as other federal laws protecting against discrimination based on age or disabilities.

    But there is no similar federal legislation to protect LGBT workers from discrimination in the workforce, and Eichner notes, the states have largely failed to provide protections as well. "Twenty-nine states, including all of the South, and most of the Midwest and West, afford no employment discrimination for gays and lesbians. Moreover, the twenty-one state statutes that offer some protection generally are significantly limited in scope," she writes.

    Eichner says it's time for Congress to act by finally passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). She explains:

    ENDA would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity with respect to hiring, firing, and terms of employment. The bill would also protect workers from retaliation. In this way, ENDA is an important step toward ensuring fairness for LGBT workers. The legislation stands for the proposition that like other employees, gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees should be judged on their work performance, rather than on their sexual orientation or gender identity.

    As it stands now, far too many LGBT workers are confronted with discrimination within the workplace. Citing a CareerBuilder.com study, Eichner notes that twenty-eight percent of LGBT workers reported suffering from workplace discrimination.

    "In one reported case, a gay maintenance worker had his hands and feet bound by his co-workers. In another, a transgender corrections officer was smashed into a concrete wall. Further accounts of LGBT workers who are subjected to harassing comments and unequal working conditions once their status was discovered abound," Eichner writes.

    The Issue Brief, "The Employment Non-Discrimination Act: Requiring Fairness for All Employees Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity," is available here.

  • April 16, 2010
    Guest Post

    By Abby R. Rubenfeld is a member of the National Family Law Advisory Council of the National Center for Lesbian Rights and the principal of Rubenfeld Law Office and an adjunct professor of law at Vanderbilt Law School. She is the former Legal Director of Lambda Legal.

    The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), H.R. 3017, was considered in the House Education and Labor Committee on September 23, 2009. The ENDA Senate bill was considered in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee on November 5, 2009. This vital legislation would help end discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer was quoted this week in CQ Politics as saying that the House is likely to consider [this] legislation this year.

    From my perspective, and that of my clients in Tennessee, the sooner the better. This legislation has been languishing for months in this Congress, while my office is contacted regularly by individuals who have been subjected to discrimination. This is a real problem that affects real people, making it difficult for them to support themselves and their families. In these difficult times, ENDA is urgently needed to help people get and keep jobs. Providing vulnerable workers with protections against discrimination because of sexual orientation and gender identity is an urgent piece of the nation's important business. This legislation is timely, ready and ripe for passage. The House, where Congressman Frank and 199 members are already co-sponsors, should pass ENDA first, then send it on to the Senate, which should act swiftly to pass this measure.