drug policy

  • May 24, 2012
    BookTalk
    Willie Mays Aikens
    Safe at Home
    By: 
    Gregory Jordan

    By Gregory Jordan, an author and journalist


    I remember standing with Willie Mays Aikens outside his halfway house in a hardscrabbled  corner of Kansas City as night fell in June 2009. I was there to write a book about his life; he was merely trying to make sorts of his life. He would be late for sign-in in two minutes, but showed no urge to rush. He never rushed - his innate cool and Southern style made rushing inconceivable. But that night he seemed unnerved. Not nervous – never that, either. But unnerved at how he would provide for the woman who would soon be his wife, for a daughter at an expensive college, and for her younger sister who had her eyes set on other expensive colleges.

    He was an ex-con, a month out of the slammer after learning the hard way what mandatory minimum sentencing is, and he had been offered a job on a road crew fixing potholes. He had two bad hips, two bad knees, an empty bank account, and a used car that broke down every other day. But he also had something he hadn’t had in over 14 years: freedom. And one more thing: spiritual cleanliness. He was not only drug free, not only did he have that cursed addiction tucked in under his hat where it belonged, but he also had what he called “a spiritual life.” He correlated it with God and churchgoing; I equated it with his boundless hope and joy. 

    As I walked him up the steps of the big brick building that night, I looked at my watch. He walked through the swinging doors, signed in, and the second hand on my wristwatch hit twelve as he put down the pen. 9 p.m. on the nose, and Mr. Cool Faith Hope Joy was heading to his bunk bed.

    I walked to my rental car, and thought: if I were a betting man, I’d bet on him. He wants it. He can taste it. Even though they set him up and locked him up and came close to throwing away the key, he had somehow corrected himself. Not cured himself, but set a right and steady course, destination pending.

  • December 22, 2011

    by Nicole Flatow

    Law professor Andrew Ferguson has argued that citizens should perceive their duty to serve on a jury as a civic duty equivalent to voting.

    “This ideal of civic participation, the idea of we ordinary citizens coming to decide things just like they came to vote for the legislators was fundamental to the founders,” said Ferguson, a professor at the University of District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law, during a recent American Constitution Society event.

    But for the time being, many Americans are apathetic about this constitutional right.

    In comes Paul Butler, a law professor at Georgetown University who argues in The New York Times this week that jurors can play a particularly important role in making our laws fairer through the constitutional doctrine of “jury nullification.”

    The idea of the doctrine is that when jurors vote on a defendant’s guilt or innocence, they are also voting on the fairness of the underlying law, or prosecutors’ enforcement of that law.

    So if you think it is wrong to prosecute a person for marijuana possession, or if you think a particular prosecution is racially biased or inappropriate, you should vote “not guilty” in a marijuana possession trial, regardless of whether you think the person committed the crime, Butler suggests.

  • February 1, 2011
    Guest Post

    By Alex Kreit, assistant professor of law and director of the Center for Law and Social Justice at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego. Kreit is author of the ACS Issue Brief, "Toward a Public Health Approach to Drug Policy."  
    Last week, for the third year in a row, President Obama answered questions submitted and voted on by YouTube users. And, for the third year in a row, questions about drug policy generally, and marijuana legalization in particular, attracted the most votes. In fact, the top 10 questions this year all involved the war on drugs. Nothing in the President's answer to the top-voted drug policy question made news in the immediate sense; he reaffirmed his opposition to marijuana legalization and his support for increased access to treatment and use of drug courts.

    But, if we look behind the policy details, the President's statement is almost surely the most important of his administration on the subject of drug policy.

  • May 11, 2010

    The Obama administration today announced a shift in priorities for combating drug use.

    "The Strategy focuses on treatment - because despite our best efforts some people do become drug users," Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) Director Gil Kerlikowski says in a video statement. "We need to intervene early, to prevent use from progressing to addiction. We need to increase accessibility to evidence‐based treatments to help those in trouble. And we must promote comprehensive recovery support."

    The new strategy follows other changes in the federal approach to drug policy under the Obama administration, including deprioritizing medical marijuana prosecutions, pushing to end the sentencing disparity for powder- and crack-cocaine possession, and repealing a ban on publicly funded needle exchanges.

  • October 19, 2009

    Attorney General Eric Holder has announced that the Department of Justice does not consider it a priority to prosecute patients and distributors who are in "clear and unambiguous" compliance with state laws that allow for medical marijuana use.

    "This action ... reflects the clear sea change taking place, both domestically and especially internationally, regarding drug policy," writes Glenn Greenwald at Salon. "When Mexico decriminalized drugs for 'personal use' in August, the silence -- including from Washington -- was deafening[.]"

    Domestically, one may also note the recent introduction of legislation in the Senate which would end the sentencing disparity for possession of crack and powder cocaine. The minimum sentences for the same amount of the two drugs currently bears a 100:1 ratio which disproportionately affects African Americans. Companion legislation has already been introduced in the House and the Obama administration has voiced support for eliminating the disparity.

    ACS has published articles and blog posts related to debate over drug policy, including an Issue Brief by Professor Alex Kreit called Toward a Public Health Approach to Drug Policy, and guest blog posts by San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris and When Brute Force Fails author Professor Mark Kleiman.