Diversity

  • February 15, 2011

    As expected, the Senate confirmed two judicial nominees yesterday, bringing the total number confirmed in the new Congress to five, The Hill reports.

    The confirmations are an early sign that an agreement between senators to move noncontroversial business forward without procedural blocks is having some effect. There remain, however, 101 vacant seats subject to Senate confirmation on the federal courts. And federal judges are now retiring at a rate of one per week, The Washington Post reported last week in a front-page story noting that federal judicial vacancies have reached a "crisis point."

    "With 100 vacancies to fill, the Senate should be confirming judges every week as part of its regular business," NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund (LDF) President John Payton said in a statement after the vote. "We expect to see many judicial confirmations this session. Nothing is more important to the administration of our justice system."

    The Senate confirmed Mississippi Supreme Court Justice James Graves by unanimous consent for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Graves will become the first African American from Mississippi to serve on the Fifth Circuit, a development that LDF Washington Office Director Leslie Proll called a "historic" for the diversity of the federal courts.

    "Today's vote represents a sea change," Proll said after the vote. "James Graves is truly a consensus candidate; he is strongly supported by civil rights organizations and the two Republican Senators from Mississippi, Thad Cochran and Roger Wicker."

    The Senate also voted 93-0 to confirm Santa Clara Superior Court Judge Edward Davila to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

    To learn more about the judicial vacancy crisis and follow developments, visit JudicialNominations.org.

  • February 3, 2011
    BookTalk
    Advancing the Ball: Race, Reformation, and the Quest for Equal Coaching Opportunity in the NFL
    By: 
    N. Jeremi Duru

    By N. Jeremi Duru, Associate Professor of Law, Temple University, Beasley School of Law.
    On Sunday, February 6, the Pittsburgh Steelers' head coach, Mike Tomlin, will lead his team into its second National Football League Super Bowl Championship game in three years. He is among the most respected head coaches in the league, and at his pace, he may one day find himself enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. He will freely admit, however, that just a few years before the Steelers hired him in 2007, his chances of landing a head coaching position in the NFL would have been frighteningly slim because of a single characteristic: his race.

    For decades, the NFL had been a colossal embarrassment from an equal employment opportunity perspective. Between 1926 and the start of the 1989 season, the league featured no African American head coaches, and in the decade that followed, it featured only a few. Neither the National Basketball Association nor Major League Baseball had been nearly as historically homogenous in this respect, and by the turn of the century, both leagues were legions ahead of the NFL in terms of diversity in off-the-field and off-the-court positions.

    In 2002, however, two lawyers, Cyrus Mehri and Johnnie Cochran, who were both avid football fans disconcerted with the dearth of African American coaches in the NFL, launched a movement that would dramatically impact the NFL and provide black coaches like Mike Tomlin the opportunity to prove themselves. Advancing the Ball: Race, Reformation, and the Quest for Equal Coaching Opportunity in the NFL explores this movement and what it has meant to the NFL and to broader society.

    The movement began with a University of Pennsylvania economics professor's statistical analysis, which revealed that the few African Americans who attained NFL head coaching positions performed more effectively than their white counterparts but nonetheless had fewer opportunities to ply their trade. Mehri and Cochran, emboldened by the statistics, expanded the analysis into a full blown report alleging racial discrimination in NFL, and, anxious to take the NFL to task, they issued a brash and public litigation threat. A small group of grizzled African American NFL veterans who had long resented being frozen out of off-the-field leadership positions in the league soon caught wind of the lawyers' threat and joined them in their insistence that the NFL change.

  • March 2, 2010

    The American legal market's contraction resulted in a dearth of legal jobs, and a flood of attorneys willing to fill them. But a new report brings to light the disproportionate impact that the financial crisis had on African-American and other minority attorneys.

    "Overall, big firms shed 6 percent of their attorneys between 2008 and 2009 -- and, amid the bloodletting, lost 9 percent of their minority lawyers," reports Emily Barker at The American Lawyer. The periodical based its findings on survey responses from 191 large law firms, seeking employment data in both years, and just released "The Diversity Scorecard 2010," available here.

    In sum, the survey found: [Brackets, link in original.]

    The data shows that, while minority lawyers as a whole lost ground, not all groups were affected equally. In proportional terms, African-Americans lost the most: the percentage of all black lawyers fell by 13 percent (462 lawyers), with the number of black nonpartners sliding by a startling 16 percent. Translation: Almost one in six African-American nonpartners left the surveyed firms in the space of a year without being replaced [see "In Retreat"].

  • January 13, 2010
    The Seattle Seahawks swift hiring of USC's Pete Carroll and its apparent short-shrift of the NFL's Rooney Rule, which is intended to diversify the League's head-coaching ranks, may actually work to strengthen the rule, writes Johnette Howard for ESPN.com. The Seattle Seahawks apparently had settled on Carroll and gave a cursory interview to the Viking's Assistant Head Coach/Defensive Coordinator Leslie Frazier (right).

    Howard notes that the Rooney Rule adopted by the NFL in 2002 after pressure from prominent attorneys, the late Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., civil rights attorney Cyrus Mehri, and labor economist Dr. Janice Madden, has continued to be bolstered by outside pressure. (Including an Issue Brief released by ACS.)

    Howard writes:

    A watchdog group, the Fritz Pollard Alliance [for which Mehri serves as counsel], now monitors how well teams comply, along with the NFL. The same group - buttressed by a persuasive argument that attorney Douglas Proxmire published in a December 2008 paper for the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy - succeeded just months ago in getting the NFL to extend the Rooney Rule to hiring of general managers and other front-office personnel.

    The Seahawks case should be another pivot point. More pressure needs to be exerted on [NFL commissioner] Goodell now.

    In his ACS Issue Brief, "Coaching Diversity: The Rooney Rule, Its Application and Ideas for Expansion," Proxmire noted the 2002 report co-authored by Cochran, Mehri and Madden, detailing the NFL's hiring and firing practices over the previous 15 seasons. Their report, Proxmire wrote led "to an obvious, but disconcerting conclusion: despite an overall better record than their white counterparts, black coaches had a difficult time getting hired, and once hired, black head coaches were fired before their white counterparts." Proxmire also urged the NFL to strengthen the Rooney Rule by extending it to cover front-office vacancies. Last summer, Commissioner Roger Goodell announced that the League would indeed require NFL teams to interview more minority candidates for front-office openings.

  • October 13, 2009

    One court-watcher says that President Obama should be applauded for furthering judicial diversity. But wait, says another. 

    "Women and ethnic minorities have long been underrepresented in the federal judiciary compared with the U.S. population," notes Professor Carl Tobias in his recent National Law Journal op-ed heralding Obama's appointment of several women and jurists of color. "Eighty-four percent of federal judges are white. Female jurists comprise 20%. African-Americans constitute 8%. Out of the almost 1,300 sitting federal judges, a mere 11 are Asian-American and only one is a Native American. A significant percentage of the 94 federal districts has never had a jurist who is a woman or a person of color."

    Upon review of the president's nominations, Tobias concludes that "the chief executive deserves substantial credit for nominating large numbers and percentages of highly qualified, diverse candidates whom the Senate should promptly approve."

    Another observer argues that one form of diversity remains yet to be addressed by the president. At Sentencing Law and Policy, Professor Douglas Berman writes that there has been little diversity among the résumés of Obama's judicial nominees: