BitTorrent

  • April 6, 2010

    Broadband service provider Comcast fended off the federal government's attempt to pursue a "net neutrality" policy, when a federal appeals court ruled that Comcast can limit the ability of certain types of information to be easily shared over the Internet. The New York Times reported, "The decision by the United State Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit specifically concerned the efforts of Comcast, the nation's largest cable provider, to slow down customers' access to a service called BitTorrent, which is used" to exchange files over the Internet.

    Comcast caught the attention of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) when it started throttling of BitTorrent, supposedly to ensure greater broadband capacity. The FCC issued rules forcing broadband providers to halting the practice to ensure "net neutrality," to limit discrimination against users of BitTorrent. In the case, the federal appeals court rejected the FCC's arguments (pdf) that it had authority under federal law to enforce regulation ensuring net neutrality.

    "It is true the ‘Congress gave the [Commission] broad and adaptable jurisdiction so that it can keep pace with rapidly evolving communications, the appeals court concluded in Comcast v. FCC. "It is also true that ‘[t]he Internet is such a technology,' indeed, ‘arguably the most important innovation in communications in a generation.' Yet notwithstanding the ‘difficult regulatory problem of rapid technological change' posed by the communications industry, ‘the allowance of wide latitude in the exercise of delegated powers is not the equivalent of untrammeled freedom to regulate activities over which the statute fails to confer ... Commission authority.'"

    In a press statement S. Derek Turner, research director for Free Press, one of the public interest groups that urged the FCC to regulate Comcast's efforts to stifle BitTorrent traffic, said the decision leaves "the agency unable to protect consumers in the broadband marketplace, and unable to implement the National Broadband Plan. As a result of this decision, the FCC has virtually no power to stop Comcast from blocking Web sites. The FCC has virtually no power to make policies to bring broadband to rural America, to promote competition, to protect consumer privacy or truth in billing."

  • December 29, 2009
    Wired's David Kravets notes a "landmark" federal court decision of last week that a string of torrent Web sites are unlawful, allowing for massive copyright infringements. Wired said the Dec. 21 decision, while not unexpected, is "the first in the United in which a federal judge found that" torrent or BitTorrent Web search engines are "an unlawful avenue to free movies, music, videogames and software."

    The lawsuit was lodged by Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and resulted in a summary judgment ruling against www.isohunt.com, www.torrentbox.com, www.podtropolis.com and www.ed2k-it.com, all owned by Gary Fung. The plaintiffs, U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson wrote, "asserted that, through his operation and promotion of the websites, Fung allows users to download infringing copies of popular movies, television shows, sound recordings, software programs, video games, and other copyrighted content free of charge. "

    Judge Wilson dismissed Fung's arguments that his sites were distinguishable from other file-sharing sites that have been shuttered for copyright infringements, such as Napster.

    The judge wrote in Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Fung:

    These technological details are, at their core, indistinguishable from previous technologies. In fact, Defendants' technologies appear to improve upon the previous technologies by permitting faster downloads are large files such as movies. Such an improvement quite obviously increases the potential for copyright infringement.

    Fung told Wired that he was considering an appeal, maintaining that provisions in copyright law should protect Torrent sites that remove content when requested by rights-holders.

    [Image via the Law Office of Lisa N. Kaufman.]