July 2009

  • July 25, 2009

    In commemoration of the widely anticipated confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the 111th Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, a unique tribute is being composed. Arturo O'Farrill (right), leader of the Afro-Latin Jazz Orchestra once led by his father, the legendary Cuban trumpeter and bandleader Chico O'Farrill, is being commissioned to create an original work of music to honor Judge Sotomayor.

    NPR's jazz blog A Blog Supreme interviewed O'Farrill this week: 

    A Blog Supreme: What is it about her life story that inspires your compositional ideas?

    O'Farrill: Her decision to forgo the trappings of commercial law and devote her life to public defense and interpretation of law. Clearly, she could be a very successful and wealthy person, and instead chose a life of public service. We need more heroes like her.

    A Blog Supreme: How do you express legal concepts through music?

    O'Farrill: Music is all about law and the flexibility of it. We make rules in music theory that are constantly expanding and progressing. This shows that human interpretation of right and wrong, like chromatic possibilities, is constantly reinventing itself.

  • July 24, 2009
    BookTalk
    Holy Hullabaloos
    A Road Trip to the Battlegrounds of the Church/State Wars
    By: 
    Jay Wexler, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
    I remember practically the exact moment when I came up with the idea for Holy Hullabaloos. I was sitting on my gray couch reading Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell, really enjoying her bizarre road trip to all these places having something to do with the country's three non-Kennedy-related-presidential-assassinations (Lincoln, McKinley, Garfield) when I suddenly realized-hey, I can go on a road trip too! I was about to begin a sabbatical after six years of teaching church/state law, and what better way to spend my time than to go check out these places I had been teaching about and writing about for so long? I had always wondered what the Hasidic community of Kiryas Joel was like (was everyone there a Satmar?). I had always wanted to view some legislative prayers (how many people were on the Senate floor during the prayer?). I had always wanted to see a Friday Night Lights football game at Santa Fe High School in East Texas (are they still praying before kickoff even after Santa Fe v. Doe?). I think I got up from the couch and started knocking out the proposal that very day.

    It's one thing to take a road trip and see a bunch of places, though, and quite another to discover stuff that people might want to read about. In the back of my head I think I always knew that I would have to actually talk to some people in these places if the book was going to be at all interesting. But since I'm kind of an anti-social weirdo, the prospect of interviewing people was kind of terrifying. I hadn't conducted an interview since junior year of high school, when I interviewed Mr. Robinson, a young new physics teacher at our school. I asked him if he wanted to teach for his entire career, and he told me he planned at some point to go back to grad school. Unfortunately, in the paper "grad school" came out as "grade school," and Robinson, who was already kind of struggling as it was, subsequently lost control of his class entirely. Oops.

  • July 24, 2009

    University of Maryland School of Law Professor Sherrilyn Ifill, contributor to the recent ACSblog symposia "Experts on Ricci" and "Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearings," followed up with further examination of race and the confirmation hearings published by the Baltimore Sun. An excerpt of her analysis follows: 

    Near the end of Judge Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearings for a seat on the Supreme Court, the Senate Judiciary Committee's ranking Republican, Jeff Sessions of Alabama, announced to a reporter that he was "proud" that the Senate Republicans had taken up the challenge laid down by Attorney General Eric Holder earlier this year when in a speech at the Justice Department he said that America is a "nation of cowards" when it comes to talking about race. Mr. Sessions' cynical misappropriation of Mr. Holder's call for candid racial dialogue was just another in the long list of the calculated and deeply corrosive manipulations that characterized the discussion of race in the Judiciary Committee chambers.

  • July 24, 2009
    Guest Post

    By Nate Cardozo, Open Government Legal Fellow, Electronic Frontier Foundation

    This week, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed suit to compel the CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and other members of the intelligence community to turn over documents detailing their concerns about their own misdeeds. We sued under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), a law that allows anyone to request information about the federal government's activities. President Obama has called the FOIA "the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government."

    The documents we're seeking involve reports to the little-known Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB), which was created within the Executive Office of the President in the aftermath of Watergate. Until last year, the board was the primary body within the executive branch providing accountability for the intelligence community. Every intelligence agency was required by executive order to send the IOB quarterly reports of "any intelligence activities of their organizations that they have reason to believe may be unlawful or contrary to Executive order or Presidential directive." The IOB reviewed and summarized this information for the President, and forwarded reports of misconduct that it believed violated the law to the Attorney General for prosecution. With few exceptions, reports to the IOB have not been made public.

    In February, 2008, President Bush issued a controversial executive order undercutting the IOB's oversight role, shifting much of the board's responsibility to the newly created Director of National Intelligence (DNI). While the IOB still receives reports of the intelligence community's questionable activity, it no longer has the authority to refer those reports to the Attorney General for prosecution. That job that now falls to the DNI. Intelligence agencies do not have to file reports with the IOB or the DNI quarterly, but rather when "appropriate."

  • July 24, 2009
    Recent Supreme Court decisions that have altered procedure for filing civil lawsuits have prompted congressional action. The BLT reports that Sen. Arlen Specter has introduced the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009 to counter the high court's decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (pdf) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (pdf). In Iqbal, the high court ruled that federal judges have greater discretion to dismiss complaints, which according to some Supreme Court practitioners will make it easier for judges to quickly toss civil lawsuits out of court. Stephen B. Burbank, a University of Pennsylvania Law School professor, told The New York Times that the Iqbal decision amounts to a "blank check for federal judges to get rid of cases they disfavor."

    Specter's legislation is aimed at requiring the federal courts to follow traditional civil procedure rules for filing lawsuits. Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure simply requires that complaints include "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." As noted by The BLT, Iqbal now requires plaintiffs to produce more facts, and allows judges greater ability to dismiss them. Writing for the Iqbal majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said that a court must "draw on its judicial experience and common sense" in deciding whether a complaint is plausible.

    Specter said, "The effect of the Court's actions will no doubt be to deny many plaintiffs with meritorious claims access to the federal courts and, with it, any legal redress for their injuries," The BLT reported.